Category: Entrepreneurship Theory

The blogs in the “Entrepreneurship Theory” category explore the conceptual foundations underpinning entrepreneurial activity—going beyond “how to start a business” to ask why, how, and under what conditions entrepreneurship emerges and scales. They tackle topics like social and network capital, the role of collective self‑efficacy, and the diversity of entrepreneurial pathways (e.g., discussing “the five types of student entrepreneur”). They examine how individual attributes (such as risk‑tolerance, mindset, and resources) interact with environmental factors (such as economy, sector, and ecosystem). The series emphasises the pedagogical and research‑based side of enterprise education: how we teach, conceptualise and evaluate entrepreneurship. In doing so, these blogs provide academic entrepreneurs, policy‑makers and educators with meaningful lenses through which to view enterprise—not just as a business venture but as a dynamic, socially embedded phenomenon.

Exploring Entrepreneurship Theory
Over the years, the study of entrepreneurship has evolved, giving rise to a myriad of theories that attempt to explain the complex nature of entrepreneurial activity. The journey of understanding entrepreneurship began with the Opportunity Recognition Theory. Historically, entrepreneurs were seen as individuals with a keen eye for spotting unmet market needs. This theory posited that the essence of entrepreneurship lay in the ability to recognize and act upon these unique opportunities, setting the foundation for future theories.

As the business landscape became more competitive, the Resource-Based Theory emerged, emphasizing the importance of resources in entrepreneurial success. Entrepreneurs were no longer just opportunity spotters; they were resource mobilizers, gathering the necessary human, financial, and physical assets to drive their ventures forward.

However, the linear approach of first spotting an opportunity and then gathering resources was challenged by the Effectuation Theory. Saras Sarasvathy’s groundbreaking work suggested that many entrepreneurs start with their available means and then co-create opportunities, turning the traditional model on its head.

In the early 20th century, Joseph Schumpeter introduced the Innovation Theory, painting entrepreneurs as agents of “creative destruction.” They were the disruptors, introducing innovations that rendered old industries obsolete and paved the way for new economic structures.

While these theories focused on external factors, the Psychological Trait Theory looked inward, suggesting that inherent psychological traits could predispose individuals to entrepreneurial success. This theory sparked debates on whether entrepreneurs were born or made, leading to extensive research on entrepreneurial characteristics.

The importance of relationships and networks in entrepreneurship was highlighted by the Social Network Theory. Entrepreneurs were not isolated actors but were deeply embedded in networks that provided them with vital information, resources, and support.

The Institutional Theory then broadened the perspective, examining how external institutional environments influenced entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurs were not just reacting to market opportunities but were also shaped by the regulatory, cultural, and societal contexts in which they operated.

The Push and Pull Theory provided insights into the motivations behind entrepreneurial pursuits. While some were driven by external factors pushing them into entrepreneurship, others were pulled by the allure of opportunity and independence.

As the global entrepreneurial landscape became more interconnected, the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory emerged, emphasizing the importance of a supportive environment in fostering entrepreneurial activity. This theory highlighted the symbiotic relationship between entrepreneurs and their ecosystems.

Lastly, the Human Capital Theory brought the focus back to the entrepreneur, emphasizing the role of knowledge, skills, and experience in entrepreneurial success. This theory underscored the importance of continuous learning and adaptation in the ever-evolving world of entrepreneurship.

In conclusion, the development and progression of these theories reflect the multifaceted nature of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurahip sits at the interconnection of all business theories. From opportunity spotters to innovators, resource mobilizers to network builders, the entrepreneur’s role has been viewed through various lenses. These theories, built over time, offer a comprehensive understanding of the entrepreneurial journey, each adding a unique layer to the rich tapestry of entrepreneurial research.

List the ten most important Entrepreneurship Theories

So for our students of entrepreneurship, now I am going to list them with key references to the original sources:
1. Opportunity Recognition Theory: This theory posits that successful entrepreneurs have a unique ability to recognize and capitalize on new business opportunities that others might overlook.
  - Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  - Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
2. Resource-Based Theory: This theory emphasizes the importance of acquiring and leveraging key resources (human, financial, physical, and organizational) to gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
  - Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  - Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
3. Effectuation Theory: Introduced by Saras Sarasvathy, this theory suggests that entrepreneurs often start with what they have (resources, knowledge, networks) and then choose ventures based on these means, rather than starting with a pre-determined goal.
  - Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-263.
  - Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Song, M., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 1-18.
4. Innovation Theory: Proposed by Joseph Schumpeter, this theory highlights the role of entrepreneurs as innovators who disrupt existing markets and create new ones through the introduction of new products, services, or processes.
  - Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
  - Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. MIT press.
5. Psychological Trait Theory: This theory suggests that certain psychological traits, such as risk-taking propensity, need for achievement, and locus of control, predispose individuals to become successful entrepreneurs.
  - McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.
  - Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509-520.
6. Social Network Theory: This theory emphasizes the importance of social networks in providing entrepreneurs with resources, information, and support, which can be crucial for the success of their ventures.
  - Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
  - Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
7. Institutional Theory: This theory focuses on how institutional environments (like regulatory structures, cultural norms, and societal values) can influence entrepreneurial activity and outcomes.
  - DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  - Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
8. Push and Pull Theory: This theory suggests that entrepreneurs are either “pushed” into entrepreneurship due to factors like job dissatisfaction or unemployment, or “pulled” due to factors like spotting an opportunity or a desire for independence.
  - Gilad, B. (1984). Entrepreneurship: The issue of creativity in the market place. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(3), 151-161.
  - Hisrich, R. D., & Brush, C. (1984). The woman entrepreneur: Management skills and business problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 22(1), 30-37.
9. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory: This theory posits that entrepreneurship thrives in environments where various elements (like funding, talent, infrastructure, and culture) support and nurture entrepreneurial activity.
  - Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.
  - Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.
10. Human Capital Theory: This theory emphasizes the importance of knowledge, skills, and experience in influencing an entrepreneur’s ability to recognize opportunities and succeed in their ventures.
  - Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
  - Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341-358.
Entrepreneurship, a dynamic field, has been shaped by various theories over the years. The Opportunity Recognition Theory posits that entrepreneurs have a knack for identifying market gaps. The Resource-Based Theory underscores the importance of leveraging resources for a competitive edge. In contrast, the Effectuation Theory suggests entrepreneurs co-create opportunities based on available means. Schumpeter’s Innovation Theory paints entrepreneurs as disruptors, while the Psychological Trait Theory explores inherent traits that predispose individuals to entrepreneurship. The Social Network Theory emphasizes the significance of relationships, and the Institutional Theory examines the influence of external environments on entrepreneurial behavior. The Push and Pull Theory delves into entrepreneurial motivations, and the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory highlights the interplay between entrepreneurs and their environments. The Human Capital Theory focuses on the role of knowledge and experience.

If we were to broaden the scope of the theories under review then I would include, Cultural Theory of Entrepreneurship suggests that cultural values and beliefs can either foster or hinder entrepreneurial activities. The Legitimacy Theory posits that for startups to succeed, they need to gain legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders. The Ambiguity and Uncertainty Theory emphasizes how entrepreneurs navigate and thrive in uncertain environments. Together, these theories provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted world of entrepreneurship.

The potential path for entrepreneurship as a field of research

Looking forward, the landscape of entrepreneurship is bound to evolve in response to global challenges, technological advancements, and changing societal values. Here are some potential directions for the development of entrepreneurial theories in the future:
1. Sustainability and Environmental Entrepreneurship Theory: As environmental concerns become paramount, a theory focusing on entrepreneurs who prioritize sustainability, green technologies, and eco-friendly practices might emerge. This theory would delve into the motivations, challenges, and opportunities faced by “eco-preneurs.”
2. Digital and Virtual Entrepreneurship Theory: With the rise of virtual realities, blockchain, and digital spaces, understanding entrepreneurship in these realms will become crucial. This theory might explore how entrepreneurs create value in purely digital ecosystems.
3. Social Impact Entrepreneurship Theory: As societal challenges grow, entrepreneurs focusing on social impact will gain prominence. This theory would study the balance between profit-making and creating societal value.
4. Neuro-Entrepreneurship Theory: With advancements in neuroscience, there might be a deeper exploration of the entrepreneurial brain, understanding decision-making, risk-taking, and innovation at a neural level.
5. Resilience and Adaptability Theory: In a world facing rapid changes and crises (like pandemics), understanding how entrepreneurs adapt, pivot, and remain resilient will be crucial.
6. Inclusive Entrepreneurship Theory: This would focus on promoting entrepreneurship in traditionally marginalized groups, understanding the unique challenges and opportunities they face.
7. Space Entrepreneurship Theory: As space exploration becomes more commercialized, understanding entrepreneurship beyond our planet might become a reality.
8. Bio-Entrepreneurship Theory: With biotechnology advancing rapidly, a theory focusing on entrepreneurs at the intersection of biology, ethics, and business could emerge.
9. Gig and Platform Economy Theory: As the gig economy grows, understanding the entrepreneurial opportunities and challenges in platform-based businesses will be essential.
10. Cultural Fusion Entrepreneurship Theory: As the world becomes more interconnected, entrepreneurs who can fuse multiple cultures to create globally appealing products and services might become more prominent.
While it’s challenging to predict the future with certainty, these directions reflect the evolving challenges and opportunities in our world. As always, entrepreneurial theories will evolve to provide insights and frameworks that resonate with the times, as the very definition of entrepreneurship has.

Written in August 2023, so lets see what happens.
September 8, 2023
How can entrepreneurial interventions in a university context impact the entrepreneurial intention of their students? – My Critical review of my own paper
Summary of the paper

Please go and read the original paper, here. For those with less time, here is a summary…

This paper delves into the relationship between the entrepreneurial intentions of higher education students and the interventions universities can offer to bolster these intentions. Data was gathered from 679 undergraduates from Chinese and UK universities using a paper-based questionnaire. The study’s foundation is the integrated model of entrepreneurial intentions. Key findings indicate a strong demand for various entrepreneurial interventions, with business training programs being the most sought after, followed by mentoring, specialised business advice, low-cost financing, business networking events, and enterprise clubs. The paper also reveals that students with different “Intention Horizons” seek different intervention portfolios. This research underscores a previously unexplored connection between a budding entrepreneur’s Intention Horizon, university interventions, and entrepreneurial actions. The paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on entrepreneurship education by emphasising the importance of context, students’ prior experiences, and the significance of these interventions in fostering new ventures.

Key Insights

The paper provides three key insights which support the development of Entrepreneurship education:
1. Intention Horizons: The paper introduces the concept of “Intention Horizons,” suggesting that students’ entrepreneurial intentions can be categorized into different timeframes, such as immediate, short-term, and long-term. This nuanced understanding can help institutions tailor their interventions more effectively.
2. Role of Universities: The research emphasizes the pivotal role universities play in shaping and nurturing entrepreneurial intentions. By offering targeted interventions, universities can significantly influence students’ entrepreneurial trajectories.
3. Diverse Needs: The study highlights that students have varied needs based on their entrepreneurial intentions. For instance, those with immediate entrepreneurial intentions might prioritize business training, while those with long-term intentions might seek mentoring. This underscores the importance of a diversified approach to entrepreneurship education.
Further investigation is required

Upon further reflection, research, and also based on the paper’s content and findings, the following further investigations should be pursued:
1. Diverse Cultural Contexts: While the study focused on Chinese and UK universities, it would be insightful to expand the research to universities in other cultural and economic contexts to understand if the findings hold universally or if there are regional variations in entrepreneurial intentions and the effectiveness of interventions.
2. Longitudinal Study: A longitudinal study tracking the same set of students over several years could provide insights into how their entrepreneurial intentions evolve over a series of time horizons and how different interventions impact their entrepreneurial journey in the long run.
3. Effectiveness of Interventions: While the paper identifies the perceived need for various interventions, a deeper investigation into the actual effectiveness of these interventions in fostering successful entrepreneurial ventures would be valuable.
4. Role of Technology: In the age of digital transformation, understanding how technological interventions, such as online entrepreneurial courses, virtual mentorship platforms, and digital networking events, impact entrepreneurial intentions would be relevant.
5. Psychological Factors: Delving deeper into the psychological factors that influence entrepreneurial intentions, such as risk tolerance, fear of failure, and intrinsic motivation, could provide a more holistic understanding of the entrepreneurial mindset.
6. Comparison with Non-University Interventions: Comparing the impact of university-based interventions with interventions offered by non-academic institutions, such as incubators, accelerators, and industry associations, could provide insights into the most effective environments for fostering entrepreneurship.
7. Role of Peer Influence: Investigating the role of peer influence, group dynamics, and collaborative projects in shaping entrepreneurial intentions could offer a new dimension to understanding the social aspects of entrepreneurship education.
8. Customised Interventions: Researching the effectiveness of customised interventions tailored to individual students’ needs and aspirations, as opposed to one-size-fits-all programmes, could provide insights into more personalised approaches to entrepreneurship education.
9. Impact of Faculty and Curriculum: Understanding the influence of faculty expertise, teaching methodologies, and curriculum design on shaping entrepreneurial intentions could highlight areas for academic improvement.
10. Post-Graduation Tracking: Tracking students post-graduation to assess how many actually embark on entrepreneurial ventures and the success rate of these ventures could provide concrete data on the real-world impact of university interventions.
These investigations would not only build upon the findings of the paper but also contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of entrepreneurship education and its impact on fostering entrepreneurial ventures.
August 29, 2023
Unleashing the Entrepreneurial Spirit in Kenya: The Role of Financiers in Empowering Business Founders
Introduction

Kenya has emerged as a vibrant hub for entrepreneurship in East Africa, boasting a diverse and dynamic business ecosystem. Over the years, the country has witnessed a surge in startups and innovative ventures that are addressing local challenges, creating job opportunities, and contributing to economic growth. However, the development of entrepreneurship in Kenya faces several challenges, particularly concerning access to finance. In this blog, I would like to explore the growth of entrepreneurship in Kenya, the obstacles it encounters, and how financiers can play a pivotal role in supporting and nurturing this ecosystem of business founders.
1. The Rise of Entrepreneurship in Kenya
Kenya’s entrepreneurial journey is a testament to the determination and resilience of its people. A combination of factors has contributed to the growth of entrepreneurship in the country:

a) Technological Advancements: Kenya has embraced technological innovations, particularly in the mobile and digital space. The proliferation of mobile phones and affordable internet access has created new opportunities for entrepreneurs to reach customers, access information, and conduct business efficiently.

b) Youthful Population: Kenya boasts a predominantly young population, with a significant portion of its citizens falling within the productive age group. This demographic advantage has led to a surge in entrepreneurial ventures, with young people eager to solve local challenges and explore innovative solutions.

c) Supportive Policy Environment: The Kenyan government has recognised the importance of entrepreneurship in driving economic growth and job creation. Policies aimed at promoting entrepreneurship, such as tax incentives and streamlined business registration processes, have facilitated the establishment and growth of startups.

d) Incubators and Accelerators: The rise of business incubators and accelerators in Kenya has provided aspiring entrepreneurs with valuable support, mentorship, and access to networks and funding opportunities.
1. Challenges Faced by Kenyan Entrepreneurs
Despite the growth of entrepreneurship in Kenya, aspiring business founders face several challenges that hinder their progress and potential. Some of the notable obstacles include:

a) Limited Access to Finance: Access to finance remains one of the most significant barriers for Kenyan entrepreneurs. Traditional financial institutions often perceive startups as high-risk investments, leading to limited access to credit, high-interest rates, and demanding collateral requirements.

b) Infrastructural Constraints: Inadequate infrastructure, such as unreliable power supply and limited access to transportation networks, can hamper business operations and increase costs for entrepreneurs.

c) Regulatory Hurdles: Cumbersome and complex regulatory procedures can be a deterrent for startups, particularly for young and inexperienced entrepreneurs who may struggle to navigate through bureaucratic red tape.

d) Market Competition: Many sectors in Kenya are highly competitive, making it challenging for startups to gain a foothold and differentiate themselves in the market.
1. The Role of Financiers in Empowering Kenyan Business Founders
Financiers, including banks, venture capitalists, impact investors, and angel investors, have a critical role to play in supporting and empowering Kenyan entrepreneurs. By providing adequate funding and tailored financial solutions, financiers can help startups overcome financial barriers and propel their growth. Here are several ways financiers can support the development of entrepreneurship in Kenya:

a) Early-Stage Funding: Financiers can offer seed funding and early-stage financing to startups. By recognizing the potential of innovative ideas and providing capital during the nascent stages, financiers enable entrepreneurs to develop their products or services and establish a strong foundation for growth.

b) Venture Capital: Venture capital firms can play a significant role in funding high-potential startups with scalable business models. These firms not only provide capital but also offer mentorship, industry connections, and strategic guidance to help startups succeed.

c) Impact Investment: Impact investors focus on supporting businesses that generate positive social and environmental impacts alongside financial returns. By investing in socially responsible enterprises, impact investors can help address pressing social challenges in Kenya, such as healthcare, education, and clean energy.

d) Customised Financial Solutions: Financiers can design customised financial products and services that cater to the unique needs of startups and SMEs. This may include flexible repayment terms, innovative loan structures, or revenue-sharing agreements that align with the business’s cash flow patterns.

e) Financial Literacy and Mentorship: In addition to funding, financiers can provide financial literacy training and mentorship to entrepreneurs. Equipping them with financial management skills and business acumen enhances their ability to make informed decisions and manage funds efficiently.

f) Collaborative Ecosystem Building: Financiers can collaborate with incubators, accelerators, and other support organisations to create a robust entrepreneurial ecosystem. By working together, they can provide comprehensive support to startups, including access to networks, mentorship, and funding opportunities.
1. Success Stories and Best Practices
Several success stories in Kenya’s entrepreneurial landscape illustrate the transformative impact of financiers’ support:

a) “Twiga Foods” – A Kenyan startup that connects small-scale farmers to urban retailers through an innovative mobile-based supply chain platform. Twiga Foods received significant funding from venture capital firms, enabling them to expand their operations and reach.

b) “M-KOPA Solar” – The company offers affordable solar energy solutions to households in Kenya, enabling them to access clean energy without the need for upfront costs. M-KOPA Solar secured substantial impact investment to scale its operations and expand its customer base.

c) “Agritech Kenya” – This startup leverages technology to provide agricultural information, inputs, and financial services to smallholder farmers. Impact investors recognised the company’s potential in transforming agriculture and supporting rural communities.

Conclusion

The development of entrepreneurship in Kenya holds the key to unlocking its economic potential and fostering social progress. Despite the challenges, the entrepreneurial spirit in the country remains strong, with innovative startups driving positive change. Financiers have a crucial role to play in empowering business founders by providing much-needed funding, financial expertise, and strategic support. By investing in Kenyan entrepreneurs, financiers can help create a thriving ecosystem that fosters sustainable economic growth, job creation, and social impact.

References:
1. The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2021). “GEM 2020/2021 Global Report.” https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2020-2021-global-report/
2. African Development Bank Group. (2019). “Kenya Economic Outlook.” https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/Kenya_Economic_Outlook_-_African_Development_Bank.pdf
3. USAID Kenya. (2021). “Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Mapping in Kenya.” https://www.usaid.gov/kenya/economic-growth-and-trade/project-updates/entrepreneurship-ecosystem-mapping-kenya
4. Stanford Social Innovation Review. (2019). “Building a Culture of Entrepreneurship in Kenya.” https://ssir.org/articles/entry/building_a_culture_of_entrepreneurship_in_kenya
5. World Bank Group. (2020). “Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies.” http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/816281568768814295/pdf/Doing-Business-2020-Comparing-Business-Regulation-in-190-Economies.pdf
August 15, 2023
Fostering Entrepreneurship in Africa: The Role of Educators in Nurturing Business Founders
Introduction

Africa is a continent of immense potential, rich in natural resources and a young, dynamic population eager to make a difference. In recent years, the African entrepreneurial ecosystem has witnessed significant growth and development. The rise of startups, innovative businesses, and social enterprises has contributed to economic diversification and job creation across the continent. However, entrepreneurship in Africa still faces various challenges, and educators play a crucial role in supporting and nurturing this ecosystem of business founders. In this blog, I would like to explore the development of entrepreneurship in Africa, the challenges it faces, and how educators can contribute to its growth and success.
1. The Rise of Entrepreneurship in Africa
Africa’s entrepreneurship journey has been marked by determination and resilience. The continent has seen a growing number of startups and small businesses that are addressing local challenges, creating employment opportunities, and contributing to economic growth. One significant factor contributing to this growth is the increasing availability and affordability of technology, particularly smartphones and internet connectivity, which has expanded access to information, markets, and funding for aspiring entrepreneurs.

Additionally, the emergence of business incubators, accelerators, and venture capital firms focused on African startups has provided critical support to early-stage entrepreneurs. These initiatives offer mentorship, access to networks, and funding opportunities, boosting the chances of success for young businesses.
1. Challenges Faced by African Entrepreneurs
Despite the progress, entrepreneurs in Africa encounter several challenges that hinder their growth and sustainability. Some of the most notable obstacles include:

a) Limited Access to Finance: Access to capital remains a significant challenge for entrepreneurs, particularly those in the early stages of their ventures. Traditional financial institutions often consider startups too risky, leading to high interest rates and stringent collateral requirements. This lack of funding options can stifle innovation and limit the scalability of promising businesses.

b) Inadequate Infrastructure: Poor infrastructure, such as unreliable power supply and inadequate transportation, can impede business operations and increase costs for entrepreneurs. Moreover, a lack of supportive policies and bureaucratic barriers can hamper entrepreneurial activities.

c) Limited Entrepreneurial Education: Many aspiring entrepreneurs lack formal entrepreneurial education, hindering their ability to understand market dynamics, develop business plans, and access vital resources. This gap in knowledge can lead to a higher failure rate for startups.

d) Cultural Attitudes: Societal attitudes towards entrepreneurship can also pose challenges. In some communities, there may be a preference for traditional employment over starting a business, and failure may be stigmatised rather than viewed as a learning experience.
1. The Role of Educators in Fostering Entrepreneurship
Educators can play a pivotal role in nurturing the entrepreneurial ecosystem in Africa. By equipping students with the necessary knowledge, skills, and mindset, educators can empower them to become successful entrepreneurs. Here are several ways educators can support the development of entrepreneurship:

a) Incorporating Entrepreneurship into the Curriculum: Educational institutions should integrate entrepreneurship courses and modules into their curriculum at various levels, including primary, secondary, and tertiary education. By exposing students to entrepreneurial concepts early on, educators can instill an entrepreneurial mindset and foster innovation and problem-solving skills.

b) Creating Experiential Learning Opportunities: Entrepreneurship is best learned through practice. Educators can facilitate experiential learning opportunities, such as business plan competitions, startup challenges, and internships with local entrepreneurs or businesses. These experiences provide students with hands-on exposure to the challenges and opportunities of entrepreneurship.

c) Encouraging a Growth Mindset: Cultivating a growth mindset is crucial for aspiring entrepreneurs. Educators should inspire students to embrace failure as a stepping stone to success, encouraging resilience and perseverance in the face of challenges.

d) Facilitating Access to Resources: Educators can serve as bridges between aspiring entrepreneurs and valuable resources. They can connect students with mentors, industry experts, and potential investors, providing a supportive ecosystem for budding entrepreneurs.

e) Promoting Women Entrepreneurship: Women entrepreneurs have the potential to drive significant economic growth in Africa. Educators should actively encourage and support women’s participation in entrepreneurship through targeted programs and initiatives.

f) Collaboration with Industry: Educational institutions should establish partnerships and collaborations with the industry to align their programs with market needs. By involving entrepreneurs and business leaders in the educational process, educators can provide students with practical insights and relevant skills.
1. Success Stories and Best Practices
Numerous success stories have emerged from Africa’s entrepreneurial landscape, demonstrating the impact of education and support in fostering successful businesses. For example:

a) “Andela” – Founded in Nigeria, Andela identifies and develops software developers in Africa, providing them with training and job opportunities with global tech companies. By nurturing tech talent, Andela has made a significant impact on the African tech ecosystem.

b) “M-Pesa” – Launched in Kenya, M-Pesa revolutionized mobile banking, enabling users to send and receive money using their mobile phones. The service has had a transformative effect on financial inclusion in Africa.

c) “Flutterwave” – A Nigerian fintech startup, Flutterwave, offers payment solutions to businesses across Africa, facilitating seamless transactions and e-commerce growth on the continent.

Conclusion

Africa’s entrepreneurial ecosystem is a dynamic and promising arena for economic growth and innovation. However, entrepreneurs face several challenges that need to be addressed to unleash their full potential. Educators have a crucial role to play in nurturing the next generation of business founders by providing them with the necessary knowledge, skills, and mindset. By incorporating entrepreneurship into the curriculum, creating experiential learning opportunities, and facilitating access to resources, educators can significantly contribute to the growth and success of entrepreneurship in Africa. With the right support and guidance, the continent’s entrepreneurs can continue to drive positive change and foster sustainable development.

References:
1. AfriLabs. (n.d.). “The African Startup Ecosystem Report 2020.” https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vzB6osUgDnHvwQZlTwBD6N_yovxqJQsi/view
2. AUC. (2019). “Africa’s Development Dynamics 2019: Achieving Productive Transformation.” https://www.oecd.org/dev/development-centre/Africas-Development-Dynamics-2019.pdf
3. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2021). “GEM 2020/2021 Global Report.” https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2020-2021-global-report/
4. Tefo Mohapi. (2019). “How Africa’s Education System Can Support Entrepreneurship.” https://www.africanexponent.com/post/9055-how-africas-education-system-can-support-entrepreneurship
5. World Bank. (2019). “Africa’s Pulse, No. 21, October 2019: An Analysis of Issues Shaping Africa’s Economic Future.” http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/947021568299119925/pdf/Africas-Pulse-No-21-October-2019.pdf
August 11, 2023
Brewing Success: Business Idea, Model Development, and MVP Testing in a Coffee Shop Venture
The process of starting a business is intricate, involving various stages from conceiving an idea to launching a viable product in the market. This blog post outlines this critical process of ideation, business model development, and market testing, using the example of setting up a coffee shop.

Stage 1: Conceiving a Business Idea

Every business journey begins with an idea, the seed that has the potential to grow into a fully-fledged, successful venture. Often, the most successful business ideas emerge from identifying a problem and then creating a solution for it.

Let’s consider the idea of setting up a coffee shop. The idea could have been sparked by a lack of quality coffee places in your area, your passion for coffee, or the desire to create a cozy place for people to meet.

When ideating, it is essential to consider market trends, personal interest, and industry knowledge. Research might involve reviewing industry reports, talking to local coffee drinkers, or analyzing the competition. A good coffee shop idea should offer something distinctive, whether it’s the finest quality beans, exceptional customer service, or a unique ambiance.

Feasibility is another crucial factor. You should ask: Can I realistically open this coffee shop with my current resources and skills? Is there a sufficient customer base in my area?

Stage 2: Developing a Business Model

Once you have your coffee shop idea, the next step is to develop a business model around it. This model provides a blueprint for how your business will create, deliver, and capture value.

A tool like the Business Model Canvas is helpful to map out key components of your model. The value proposition of your coffee shop could be freshly roasted, organic coffee beans sourced directly from farmers, thus offering exceptional taste and promoting fair trade.

Identify your target customers (for example, local residents, office workers, students), and plan how you will reach these customers, such as through social media marketing, local advertising, or word-of-mouth.

Your cost structure might include expenses like rent, utilities, salaries, and cost of goods sold (like coffee beans, milk, and pastries). Revenue streams will primarily come from selling coffee and other items, but you could also consider other income sources such as selling merchandise or hosting events.

Stage 3: Testing the Market using a Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

After you’ve established your business model, it’s time to test your idea in the market. In the context of a coffee shop, an MVP could be a pop-up stand or a small kiosk in a high foot-traffic area where you can start selling your coffee and get initial customer feedback.

This MVP stage allows you to validate your coffee shop idea before investing significant resources into full-scale shop development. It provides an opportunity to test your product on real customers, gather feedback, and refine the product accordingly.

During the MVP testing phase, your key metrics could be daily sales, customer reviews, and repeat customer rate. This feedback loop should continue until you reach a point where you’re confident your full-scale coffee shop will be well-received by a wider audience.

Conclusion

Coming up with a business idea, developing a business model, and testing the market using an MVP are integral stages in any successful business journey, even for a coffee shop. While the process can seem daunting, each step provides an invaluable learning experience, equipping you with insights and confidence to launch a product that resonates with the market, ultimately paving the way for a successful and sustainable business.

here’s a list of resources that can help you with these tasks, ranging from idea generation and business model development to MVP testing:

Business Idea Generation
1. Google Trends: Use Google Trends to identify trending topics and potential business opportunities.
2. Entrepreneur: Offers a guide on how to come up with a business idea.
Developing a Business Model

3. Business Model Canvas: This tool can help you visualise your business model and understand how each component interacts with the others.
1. Entrepreneur: A guide to creating a solid business model.
Market Research

5. Pew Research Center: Pew provides a variety of research and data on various sectors that can help with market research.
1. U.S. Small Business Administration: Offers resources for market research and competitive analysis.
Minimum Viable Product (MVP) Development

7. Lean Startup: Outlines the Lean Startup principles, which is a methodology that involves creating and testing MVPs.
1. Product Hunt: A platform where you can launch your MVP and get feedback from a community of tech-savvy early adopters.
Market Testing

9. SurveyMonkey: Allows you to create surveys for market research and customer feedback.
1. Google Analytics: Use Google Analytics to measure website traffic and understand user behaviour, which is especially helpful for businesses with an online component.
These resources will provide you with a solid starting point on your journey to start a business, providing crucial insights and tools to help you succeed.
August 4, 2023
8 factors which control productivity
The productivity of a business is controlled by a number of factors and as entrepreneurs we need to understand these factors to ensure we have sustainable businesses. So what do we mean by productivity?

Productivity is very simply defined as the ratio between output and input. Therefore increasing productivity means greater efficiency in producing output of goods and services from labour, capital, materials and any other necessary inputs.

It’s more important metric than just measuring this ratio, as it provides a benchmark by which you can measure nations, regions, industries and and most importantly for us entrepreneurs, businesses. Businesses which have higher productivity are more sustainable and therefore employees have safer jobs, paying more taxes and enable stable economic structures surrounding these businesses.

So when I review the literature on productivity I have found a number of factors which control productivity, we can put these down to eight controlling factors, In alphabetical order:
1. Finance
2. Industry & Market
3. International Trade
4. Management
5. People
6. Place
7. Processes
8. Technology
Finance

The financial capital structure of a business dictates the productivity of the business. Managers are instructed to maximize shareholders benefits and if this requires short-term (annual) rewards then this may not beneficial for the longer term productivity aims. Hill, C. W., & Snell, S. A. (1989) found that businesses with one or more of the following; a diversification strategy, R&D expenditure, capital intensity and stock concentration were all important financial factors in a business productivity. At a national level Guariglia, A., & Santos-Paulino, A. U. (2008) found that national GDP per capita and national investment generally exert a positive and significant effect on business productivity.

Industry & Market

The level of productivity is related to the industry as some industries are highly automated whilst others are still manual handmade. It’s also dictated by the market, some customers require personalised service while others want fully online and automated. One example is holidays, some people want book online without ever talking to a person from that company whilst others require a home visit and discussion of every aspect of the holiday.

The OECD provides a detailed list of productivity data sets whilst the UK provides this, and many other countries do the same.

International Trade

Trade increases productivity. Badinger, H., & Breuss, F. (2008) found an increase in the export ratio of a manufacturing business by one percentage point increases productivity by 0.6 percent on average. To be able to export your products or services a business should be of a comparable price and quality and therefore productivity. Export focused businesses have therefore higher productivity Guariglia, A., & Santos-Paulino, A. U. (2008).

Management

A number of these factors requires good management and leadership. However, a considerable amount of research has consistently found that use of effective human resource management practices enhances firm performance. Specifically, extensive recruitment, selection, and training procedures; formal information sharing, attitude assessment, job design, grievance procedures, and labour-management participation programs; and performance appraisal, promotion, and incentive compensation systems that recognize and reward employee merit have all been widely linked with valued firm-level outcomes. Huselid, M. A. (1995) and others have argued that the use of these practices will result in greater business performance, independent of the industry and business size.

People

Bakker (2014) demonstrated that to ensure a knowledge worker is optimally productive and happy, it is important that he or she can attain personal objectives and that facilities and services fit with personal needs. Bailey (1993) noted that the contribution of even a highly skilled and motivated workforce will be limited if jobs are structured, or programmed, in such a way that employees, who presumably know their work better than anyone else, do not have the opportunity to use their skillset. Most academic frameworks present variables including buildings and facilities, work processes, organisational characteristics, personal characteristics and the external context may have an impact on labour productivity (Clements-Croome, 2000; Van der Voordt, 2003; Batenburg and Van der Voordt, 2008; Mawson, 2002; Haynes, 2007).

Place

Especially within the service industry, location is one of the most important factors. The best coffee in the world may be served in Seattle but living in Cirencester doesn’t allow me to get my daily fix from there. However, the competitive environment in these two places will be different and therefore I would guess the productivity of a coffee shop in Seattle will have to be higher than that in Cirencester. (Due to taxes, real estate costs, staffing, ..etc)

We should also take into consideration business clusters, which also draws in the people and process factors. Business which form clusters will end up employing the same staff over time and therefore develop similar processes. Clusters are concentrations of highly specialized skills and knowledge, institutions, rivals, related businesses, and sophisticated customers in a particular nation or region. Proximity in geographic, cultural, and institutional terms allows special access, special relationships, better information, powerful incentives, and other advantages in productivity and productivity growth that are difficult to tap from a distance. As a result, in a cluster, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

Each location has a unique set of taxes, international trade arrangements and laws which dictate the level of productivity. Some industries are protected by law and therefore can operate with lower or higher productivity.

Processes

The first set of innovation around productivity was designing processes to improve productivity by simplifying the task, for example Ford’s production line and McDonald’s restaurant. Process engineering focuses on the design, operation, control, optimization and intensification of processes. In a knowledge economy this is typically information and data through electronic means. Data like money is not worth anything if it is not used or traded, also like money needs to be kept secure and have some form of traceability.

Technology

In traditional manufacturing (Think car manufacturing) the first stage of increasing productivity was designing the processes so that a person could do a smaller task faster, then using a machine to semi-automate the task and finally reducing the role of the person down to supervision and maintenance.

The computer has increased the productivity of many increases, most notable the Banking which now allow us access to our money from our phones, no longer having to go to a branch. Service industry productivity is increasing faster than manufacturing over the last twenty years.

For the knowledge and service economy this requires typically a computer to have knowledge and provide service. So if we are booking a flight, then the computer needs to have been programmed with a process to book one or more flights and a complete list of flights and there availability. The problem arises when you say I want to fly anywhere on friday night. So in these industries AI will provide the increased productivity that robots have provided in the car manufacturing industry.
February 1, 2019
What entrepreneurship capital is driven from your economic activity?
The impact of any economic activity on the individual should be to develop a ‘sustainable livelihood’ or value. This is measured through the resources which are available to that person, in terms of capital. Here we define capital as a resource which can be stored, held or used for the benefit of the entrepreneur.A number of academic papers have discussed what forms of capital should be measured and how this should be analysed (Scoones, 1998; Berkes & Folke, 1992; Bebbington, 1999) especially when analysing sustainable rural businesses. The impact of the economic activity should therefore be measured by evaluating the development of the entrepreneurs’ capital, based on the eight forms of capital:
1. Cultural – Cultural capital functions as a social-relation within an economy of practices (system of exchange), and comprises all of the material and symbolic goods, without distinction, that society considers rare and worth seeking.
2. Experiential (Human) – We accumulate experiential capital through actually organizing a project or solving problems and developing solutions.
3. Financial – Money, currencies, securities and other instruments of the financial system
4. Intellectual – The value of a company or organization’s employee knowledge or any proprietary information that may provide the business or entrepreneur with a competitive advantage
5. Material – Non-living physical objects form material capital
6. Natural – Made up of the world’s stock of natural resources, which includes geology, soils, air, water and all living organisms
7. Social – The networks of relationships among people who live and work in a particular society
8. Spiritual – Practices of personal values, religion, spirituality, or other means of connection to self and universe.
Entrepreneurial activity may increase one or more of these capitals depending on the entrepreneur, the type of business and the stage of the business. This connection to capital also connects with Ahmad & Hoffman (2008) who specify the ecosystem of entrepreneurship as the combination of three factors: opportunities, skilled people and resources. These factors can be driven from our Capitals. Skilled People is intellectual capital. Entrepreneurial opportunity from our social and spiritual capital.

I think we should look at this set of capitals at both a personal, business and community level, its about a set of ecosystems. At any level not all of the capitals have to be used (A Buddhist priest on a personal level may never use Financial capital, An online blogger on a business level may never use Natural capital, A town council may never use the Spiritual capital).

Each entrepreneur has a unique set of capitals, which have specific generic root causes from the entrepreneur themselves, the business industry, the addressed market and locality ecosystem they are active. The skill is understanding which and a what level is required to lead a successful business at what stage.
January 4, 2019
9 Stages of Enterprise Creation

The way we start businesses is changing and through academic research, additional knowledge, skills and tools, the process and issues around growing businesses have profoundly changed Entrepreneurship in the last twenty years. This article develops a new 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation model which is based on today entrepreneurial mindset and the business community ecosystem which molds entrepreneurs and allows their ventures grow.

The first three stages of the Enterprise Creation stages which emerged are: Discovery, Modeling, and Startup which form the new venture formation stages. The next three Existence , Survival and Success develop the business into a sustainable business entity. The last three stages: Adaption, Independence and Exit provide the entrepreneurship pathways for the entrepreneur. These final elements complete the entrepreneurship model by focusing on the success of the business, how the entrepreneur progresses beyond the business, their separation into different entities and the entrepreneurs eventual exit. The 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation are set out below:

Stage 1 – Discovery

This first stage of the 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation is centred around the focal competency of Opportunity recognition, creation and evaluation. These are the processes by which entrepreneurs identify and evaluate potential new business opportunities. An opportunity by definition is a favorable set of circumstances which creates a need for a new product, business, or service. Opportunity recognition is the process by which the entrepreneur comes up with a prospective idea for a new venture. Evaluating the opportunity takes research, exploration, and understanding of current needs, demands, and trends from consumers and others. The process of researching and surveying allows the product or service idea to develop, so that it can be modelled.

Stage 2 – Modeling

The second stage is about developing the business logic to create a business model. This is split into three parts and starts by setting out a Strategy, formulating a business model and setting the business processes to achieve the strategy . These form the key elements for the plan to start the business and, are an integral piece of submitting any proposal for an entrepreneurial or intrapreneurial business. The model should be underpinned by the resources available and those which may still need to be secured. Resource allocation and availability are extremely important to startups because sustainability and profit (not loss) depend on proper planning and understanding of the internal and external environments.

Stage 3 – Startup

The fourth stage is starting the enterprise. Once the resources detailed in the business plan are mobilised the entrepreneurial process can be effected and implementation can take place. In this stage the business may be trading or begin to research or develop a product. The aim of this stage is to have the processes in place so that the business can have a scalable, repeatable and profitable business focused on distinct customers within an identified market.

Stage 4 – Existence

At this stage the business has two core focuses; to gain enough customers to create a profitable business and, at the same time establishing production or product quality. The majority of businesses fail at this stage due, in part, to either one or both of these factors. At this stage the organisation is a simple one, the entrepreneur does everything and directly supervises subordinates, who should be of at least average competence. Systems and formal planning are minimal to nonexistent. The company’s strategy is simply to remain alive which requires the focal competency of tolerance of uncertainty, risk and failure

Stage 5 – Survival

At this stage the business should be a viable entity in terms of cash flow and resources, it has enough customers and satisfies them sufficiently with its products or services to gain repeat sales. The organisation is still simple. The company may have a limited number of employees supervised by a junior manager or supervisor. Neither of them makes major decisions independently, but instead carries out the rather well-defined orders of the entrepreneur. Formal planning is, at best, cash forecasting. The major goal is still survival, and the entrepreneur is still synonymous with the business. The entrepreneur starts to implement ideas through leadership and management which provides opportunities to scale.

Stage 6 – Success

Entrepreneurs at this point of the 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation have a number of options: capitalise on the company’s accomplishments, expand or, keep the company stable and profitable. The entrepreneur has a number of ways to capitalise, from exit to taking a ‘founders dividend’ from the business. If the entrepreneur want to expand then the core tasks are to make sure the basic organisation stays profitable so that it will not outrun its source of cash and, to develop managers to meet the needs of the growing organisation. Through the entrepreneurs leadership all managers within the business should now identify with the company’s future opportunities rather than its current condition demonstrating a success to its stakeholders.

Stage 7 – Adaptation

Businesses which reach this stage normally have a number of factors pushing them to adapt, these are normally grounded in changes either to the micro or macro environments. Businesses at this stage will normally be entering a phase of rapid change and will have to have secured the required finances to develop. At this point key management is in place with a set of operational systems. Operational and strategic planning are now a key focus. The organisation is decentralised and, at least in part, divisionalised. The key managers must be very competent to handle a growing and complex business environment. The systems, strained by growth, are becoming more refined and extensive. Both operational and strategic planning are being done and involve specific managers. The entrepreneur and the business have become reasonably separate, yet the company is still dominated by both the entrepreneur’s presence and stock control.

Stage 8 – Independence

A business at this stage should now has the advantages of size, financial resources, market share and managerial talent. Innovation and Intrapreneurship are now key factors in keeping the business in market position. The organisation has the staff and financial resources to engage in detailed operational and strategic planning. The management is decentralised, adequately staffed, and experienced. Business systems are extensive and well developed. The entrepreneur and the business are quite separate, both financially and operationally.

Stage 9 – Exit

The last of the Enterprise Creation stages is focused on exiting the business and making their separation permanent. An exit strategy will give the entrepreneur a way to reduce or eliminate their stake in the business and, if the business is successful, make a substantial profit. This stage removes the entrepreneur from primary ownership and decision-making structure of the business. Common types of exit strategies include Initial Public Offerings (IPO), strategic acquisitions and management buyouts. The organisation at this stage is generally profitable, has a definable set of resources with a clear and realistic strategy to continue. The CEO and founder(s) are separate.

9 stages of Enterprise Creation

The full paper which develops the 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation: Bozward, David and Rogers-Draycott, Matthew Charles (2017) Developing a Staged Competency Based Approach to Enterprise Creation. Proceedings of the International Conference for Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development. ISSN 2411-5320, can be found at http://eprints.worc.ac.uk/5377/

A textbook that supports learning with multiple case studies is available on Amazon.

November 24, 2017
6 Stages of the Startup

When we work with start-ups its important to provide an assessment on their journey within the startup lifecycle. Understanding where a startup is in their lifecycle allows us to assess their progress, providing mentoring to the founders and also provide a vision. The startup lifecycle is made of 6 stages of development, where each stage is made up of levels of substages, allowing for more granular assessment which helps pinpoint the main drivers of progress at each stage.

1) Discovery (or Pre-Seed)

Goal: This phase is all about discovering and validating whether you are solving a meaningful problem and whether anybody would “hypothetically” be interested in their solution.
Milestones: Founding team is formed, many customer interviews are conducted, value proposition is found, minimally viable products are created, team joins an accelerator or incubator, Friends and Family financing round, first mentors & advisors come on board.
Management Team : Founder(s)
Funding Requirements : £500 – £5,000 (always depends on the business type and technology requirements)
Business Development Milestones : Validated Problem and potential solution
Typical Funding Resources : Cash
Average Valuation : Nil (Typical Technology Start-up)
Time: 3-6 months (average for all types)

2) Seed

Goal: Development of a minimum viable product which can be shown to potential customers, sponsors and customers.
Milestones: Founding team is formed, many customer interviews are conducted, value proposition is found, minimally viable products are created, team joins an accelerator or incubator, Friends and Family financing round, first mentors & advisors come on board.
Management Team : (Core team) Founders, co-Founders, Mentor,
Business Development Milestones : Letters of intent or some preliminary relationships
Funding Requirements : (Seed Capital) £10,000 – £50,000
Typical Funding Sources : Friends and Family financing round, first mentors & advisors come on board
Average Valuation : £10,000 – £100,000
Time: 5-12 months (average for all types)

3) Validation

Goal: The Startup is looking to get early validation that people are interested in purchasing their product through orders or pre-orders with deposits.
Milestones : refinement of core features, initial user growth, metrics and analytics implementation, start-up funding, first key hires, pivots (if necessary), first paying customers, product market fit.
Management Team : (Entrepreneurial Lieutenants) At least one real manager, Founders, Mentors and Advisors
Funding Requirements : (Startup Capital) £100,000 – £300,000
Typical Funding Resources : Business Angels, Grants,
Business Development Milestones : Paying Customers
Average Valuation : £1m
Time: 9 months – 1 year

4) Established / Efficiency

Goal: The company refines the business model and improves the efficiency of their customer acquisition process. The business should be able to efficiently acquire customers in order to avoid scaling with in-effective processes.
Milestones: value proposition refined, user experienced overhauled, conversion funnel optimized, viral growth achieved, repeatable sales process and/or scalable customer acquisition channels found.
Management Team : (Risk takers) At least three real managers, Founders, Mentors and Advisors
Funding Requirements : (Venture Capital) £300,000 – £500,000
Typical Funding Resources : Venture Capital
Business Development Milestones : Profitable customers, Strategic Partners
Average Valuation : £3m
Time: 1 – 3 years

5) Scale

Goal: Startups step on the marketing drive and drives global growth very aggressively.
Milestones: massive customer acquisition, back-end scalability improvements, experienced executive team formed, process implementation, establishment of departments.
Management Team : Executive Board, Management Board, External Advisors
Funding Requirements : £1.2m – £5m
Typical Funding Resources : (Bridge Funding)
Business Development Milestones : Historical results against plan, Focused Business Plan, Strong Processes and Controls,
Average Valuation : £3-15m
Time: 3-5 years (average for all types)

6) Sustain

Goal: Develop a portfolio of customers and products, either based on one technology or a set.
Milestones: diversification of customers and revenue streams, agile product teams, public and investor relations
Management Team : Executive Board, Management Board, External Advisors, Product Teams
Funding Requirements : (IPO) Large A Round
Typical Funding Resources : IPO
Business Development Milestones : Multiple Revenue Streams,
Average Valuation : £10-30m

May 10, 2014
Entrepreneurship – In Context

Enterprise and entrepreneurship is a key driver in economic growth and can be a huge part of the solution to unemployment. Its impact also affects the whole of civilization because of the advancement in innovation technology as well as the creation of jobs that in consequence reduce poverty, according to Ernst and Young’s (2011).

“Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with less than 250 employees make up two-thirds of total employment in OECD countries. The European Commission showed in its SME Performance Review that the number of jobs in SMEs had increased at an average annual rate of 1.9%, while the number of jobs in larger enterprises increased by only 0.8% between 2002 and 2008” Ernst and Young (2011).

Ideally, governments should take an all-inclusive approach, which promotes the strengthening of the entire entrepreneurship environment. However, doing this first requires accurately measuring the multi-layered phenomenon that is entrepreneurship, as well as understanding the impact of a host of different factors on the level of entrepreneurship in a country. “These include the quality of the physical infrastructure, the health of the population, the level of education, the pace of adoption of new technologies and many other macro and micro factors” Ernst and Young (2011).

Therefore, is it essential that a ‘framework’ that can measure entrepreneurship accurately whilst analysing KPI’s (key performance indicators).

Among the key findings in Ernst and Young’s (2011) report:

1. Self-confidence is key
Our overall analysis provides a clear overview of where the G20 member countries stand with respect to fostering entrepreneurship. Combining two of our key findings — entrepreneurs’ confidence in their own country, and new business density

2. Entrepreneurship culture
The culture of a country can affect entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship on many levels. Our perceptions survey was central to our analysis of whether the culture of a country is conducive to Entrepreneurship.

3. Education and training
We go beyond looking at the overall performance of the educational system, to take a closer look at entrepreneurship specific education and assess how important this is for encouraging entrepreneurship.

4. Access to funding
Securing access to funding, both at the start-up phase and at later stages of enterprise development, is one of the biggest challenges for young entrepreneurs. We analyze the experiences of entrepreneurs in accessing funding across the G20 countries, and find some dramatic differences and valuable lessons.

5. Regulation and taxation
The regulatory and taxation environment is one of the areas in which governments have a key role in providing an enabling environment for entrepreneurial growth.

6. Coordinated support
There are typically a number of different agencies involved in facilitating and supporting entrepreneurship within a country. The level of support these agencies provide — and the extent to which they coordinate with one another — can make a crucial difference to the entrepreneurship Environment.

This increasing entrepreneurship and recognition of small enterprises in the health of the economy is also highlighted in recent reports.

According to the UK National Statistics (Nation. Stats 2012), the actual increase in the total business population between the start of 2011 and the start of 2012 will lie between 200,000 (4.4 per cent) and 253,000 (5.6 per cent).

The 4.8 million private sector businesses employed an estimated 23.9 million people, and had an estimated combined annual turnover of £3,100 billion.

The majority (62.7 per cent) of private sector businesses were sole proprietorships, 28.0 per cent were companies and 9.3 per cent were partnerships. At the start of 2012, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)3 accounted for 99.9 per cent of all private sector businesses, representing no change since 2011 and almost unchanged since 2000. SMEs also accounted for 59.1 per cent of private sector employment and 48.8 per cent of private sector turnover at the start of 2012.

For (Heseltine 2012), the prize is potentially huge. There are about 3.6 million self-employed people and sole traders in the UK, and 1.2 million businesses with at least one employee. That is 4.8 million in total. It is a fact, often noted, that if just one in 10 of these businesses took on an employee, or an additional employee, that would increase employment by 480,000.

In (Young 2012), it is estimated that if the UK had the same rate of entrepreneurship as the US, there would be approximately 900,000 additional businesses in the UK and that’s the real context for our stakeholders.

September 13, 2013