Dr David Bozward

Tag: enterprise education

  • Beyond the Bake Sale: Reimagining University-Industry Partnerships for Genuine Impact

    Title: Reimagining the University-Industry Partnership: A New Model for Impact

    There’s a certain quaintness to the traditional image of university-industry partnerships. Think career fairs, bake sales to fund student projects, perhaps a guest lecture from an industry leader. These are valuable initiatives, certainly, but they often feel like peripheral activities – a polite nod towards the ‘real world’ rather than a fundamental shift in how universities operate.

    I’m not dismissing these efforts, mind you. I’ve participated in them myself, organizing career workshops and facilitating industry mentorship programmes. But after years of observing these interactions from both sides – as an academic deeply invested in research and a consultant advising businesses – I’m convinced that we need to fundamentally reimagine the university-industry partnership. We need a model that moves beyond simple transactional exchanges and embraces genuine collaboration, one that prioritizes shared value creation over short-term gains.

    I’m not suggesting a radical overhaul, but rather a subtle recalibration – a shift in mindset that recognizes the inherent strengths of both institutions and leverages them to address complex societal challenges. It’s a vision born from witnessing firsthand the frustrating disconnect between academic research and real-world application, and fueled by a deep conviction that universities have a crucial role to play in driving innovation, productivity and economic growth.

    The Current Landscape: A History of Missed Opportunities

    Let’s be honest, the current landscape is often characterized by a degree of mutual skepticism. Universities are perceived as ivory towers, disconnected from the practical needs of businesses. Businesses, in turn, view universities as slow-moving bureaucracies, resistant to change and unwilling to commercialize their research.

    This isn’t entirely unwarranted. The traditional model often prioritizes academic publications over practical impact, incentivizing researchers to publish in high-impact (don’t get me started on those) journals rather than seeking solutions to today’s real-world problems. The intellectual property landscape can be a minefield, with complex licensing agreements and conflicting interests hindering commercialization efforts. And let’s not forget the inherent cultural differences – the academic emphasis on rigorous peer review clashes with the business imperative for rapid iteration and market validation.

    I recall one particularly frustrating experience advising a medtech startup that was struggling to secure funding for a promising new intervention. The university’s technology transfer office, while well-intentioned, was bogged down in lengthy negotiations with potential investors, delaying the project and ultimately jeopardizing its future. It was a stark reminder that good intentions alone aren’t enough; we need streamlined processes, clear incentives, and a shared commitment to driving impact.

    A New Model: Shared Value Creation at the Core, Grounded in Experiential Learning

    My vision for a reimagined university-industry partnership centres on the concept of shared value creation (The central premise of enterprise creation). It’s about moving beyond transactional exchanges and fostering deep, collaborative relationships that benefit both institutions and society as a whole. Crucially, this requires embedding experiential learning at the heart of our approach. Tools like SimVenture, for instance, offer unparalleled opportunities for students to grapple with real-world business challenges in a safe and engaging environment. Imagine undergraduate teams developing strategic plans for simulated companies, making investment decisions, navigating market fluctuations – all while receiving mentorship from industry professionals. This isn’s just theoretical learning; it’s applied knowledge, forged in the crucible of simulated experience.

    Key Pillars of a Collaborative Future:

    Here are some concrete steps we can take to build this collaborative future:

    1. Embedded Industry Fellows: Imagine a programme where experienced industry professionals are embedded at the same level, within university departments, working alongside faculty and students on real-world projects. These fellows would bring valuable insights into market needs, provide mentorship to aspiring entrepreneurs, and help bridge the gap between academic research and commercial application.
    2. Challenge-Driven Research: Instead of pursuing research topics in isolation, universities should actively solicit challenges from businesses and policymakers. This would ensure that our research is aligned with real-world needs, increasing its relevance and impact.
    3. Flexible Intellectual Property Frameworks: We need to move away from rigid, one-size-fits-all intellectual property frameworks and embrace more flexible models that encourage collaboration and innovation.
    4. Cross-Disciplinary Innovation Hubs: Universities should establish cross-disciplinary innovation hubs that bring together faculty, students, and industry partners from diverse fields to tackle complex challenges.
    5. Data-Driven Impact Assessment: We need to develop robust data-driven impact assessment frameworks that measure the real-world benefits of our research.
    6. Robust Subcontractual Oversight: Recognizing that complex projects often involve subcontracting, universities must implement rigorous oversight mechanisms. As detailed in my work on this topic, clear contractual provisions, independent audits, and transparent reporting are essential to ensure accountability, mitigate risks, and safeguard the integrity of collaborative ventures. This includes establishing clear lines of responsibility for performance, quality control, and ethical conduct across all tiers of the project.

    The Role of Policy: Incentivizing Collaboration

    Government policy also has a crucial role to play in incentivizing collaboration between universities and businesses. This could involve providing tax breaks for companies that invest in university research, creating grant programmes that specifically target collaborative projects, and streamlining regulatory processes to facilitate commercialization.

    I remember advocating for a policy change in my own state that provided tax credits to companies that partnered with universities on research projects. The impact was immediate – we saw a surge in collaborative initiatives, leading to the creation of new businesses and high-paying jobs.

    Embracing Imperfection: A Journey, Not a Destination

    This isn’t about creating a utopian vision of perfect collaboration. It’s about acknowledging that the journey will be fraught with challenges, setbacks, and disagreements. There will be times when we stumble, make mistakes, and question our assumptions. But it’s through these experiences that we learn, adapt, and ultimately build a more effective partnership.

    As I reflect on my own experiences, I’m filled with a sense of optimism and hope. I believe that universities have a vital role to play in driving innovation, creating jobs, and addressing some of the world’s most pressing challenges. And I believe that by reimagining our partnerships with businesses, incorporating experiential learning tools like SimVentures and implementing robust subcontractual oversight, we can unlock a new era of shared value creation and lasting impact.

  • Bridging Academia and Consulting: My Journey in Entrepreneurial Impact

    Bridging Academia and Consulting: My Journey in Entrepreneurial Impact

    Introduction: The Dual Lens of Academia and Consulting

    As I sit at my desk in Worcester, England, surrounded by decades-old books on entrepreneurship and a whiteboard filled with frameworks for scaling startups, I can’t help but reflect on how my career has unfolded. Over the past 25 years, I’ve oscillated between academia and consulting—roles that at first glance might seem incompatible but, in reality, are deeply intertwined. My work spans university leadership, board governance, and advising governments on entrepreneurial ecosystems, all while publishing research that informs both sectors.

    This post is a candid exploration of my journey: how I built credibility as an academic while cultivating expertise as a consultant, and the lessons I’ve learned along the way. It’s also a guide to those navigating similar paths, blending scholarly rigor with the actionable insights that consultants thrive on.

    The Academic Foundation: Teaching, Research, and “Failing Forward”

    My academic roots began in engineering, a discipline that taught me to value precision and systems thinking—a mindset I’ve carried into entrepreneurship. In 2015, as Senior Lecturer and Course Leader for Entrepreneurship at the University of Worcester, I designed a BA in Entrepreneurship that combined theory with practice. (A paper reviewing this course is here) Students weren’t just learning about business models; they were building them, often in collaboration with local businesses.

    One pivotal moment came when I tried to integrate rural entrepreneurship into the curriculum at the Royal Agricultural University (RAU). I envisioned a programme where students could apply innovation to agricultural challenges, like sustainable food systems. But early attempts faltered—the disconnect between theoretical concepts and the practical needs of rural communities left me frustrated. I realized success required more than just syllabus design; it demanded partnerships with entreprenurial ecosystem: farmers, policymakers, and local startups.

    Tip #1: Build bridges between academia and industry early. My learning at the RAU led to a revised approach: co-creating curricula with stakeholders.

    The Consultant’s Edge: From Theory to Tangible Impact

    Consulting forced me to abandon the comfort of academic abstraction. When I became Director of Employability and Entrepreneurship at GBS in 2022, I faced a stark reality: over 15,000 students—many from disadvantaged backgrounds—needed support moving beyond academia into meaningful careers.

    The challenge was twofold: scaling services without diluting quality and addressing systemic barriers like poor English proficiency. My solution? A “staged competency approach,” rooted in my research, which tailored support to students’ readiness. We embedded employability into classroom curricula, paired struggling learners with language tutors, and built employer networks. The numbers? 2,639 new roles secured by students in one year—proof that frameworks matter when paired with execution.

    Tip #2: Turn research into action. My 9 Stages of Entrepreneurial Lifecycle model wasn’t born in a vacuum; it emerged from years watching startups succeed or fail. When consulting, use your research as a lens—but adapt it to the client’s reality.

    The Tension of Dual Roles: When Worlds Collide

    Balancing academia and consulting isn’t without friction. At Albion Business School, where I serve as a Board Trustee, I championed globalizing entrepreneurship education. Yet negotiating institutional bureaucracy to adopt innovative programmes tested my patience. Similarly, advising startups in mobile gaming (via dojit, a past venture) taught me that the academic rigor of “agile methodologies” must flex to suit corporate timelines.

    Emotional Insight: There were nights when I questioned whether my dual path was sustainable. My breakthrough? Embracing the dichotomy: academia lets me explore why entrepreneurship works; consulting forces me to answer how.

    Emerging Frontiers: Opportunities in EdTech, Policy, and Rural Innovation

    The future of entrepreneurial education is digital. While my work on open educational resources with Beijing Foreign Studies University showed promise, I’ve realized scalability requires more than just free content. Hybrid formats—like virtual incubators for African startups—could democratize access, especially in regions where universities are underfunded.

    As a Fellow of The Centre for Entrepreneurs, I’ve advised governments on startup programmes and rural innovation hubs. My takeaway? Policy should incentivize ecosystems, not just businesses—for example, tax breaks for universities collaborating with local SMEs.

    Tip #3: Advocate for systems change, not just individual success. My recent work in South Sudan reflects this philosophy: educating women isn’t about creating lone entrepreneurs but fostering an ecosystem where they can thrive.

    Practical Takeaways for Aspiring Academic/Consultants

    1. Leverage interdisciplinary expertise: My engineering background informs tech ventures, while my research on rural entrepreneurship shapes policy. Never dismiss a skill as irrelevant.
    2. Embrace “messy” collaboration: My EdTech projects with China and India succeeded because we allowed cultural nuances to shape outcomes—not the other way around.
    3. Measure what matters: When I assessed the impact of student startups, I shifted focus from mere business counts to metrics like job creation and community investment.

    Conclusion: The Power of Dual Vision

    Bridging academia and consulting isn’t just a career choice—it’s a lens. By wearing both hats, I’ve crafted frameworks that endure (my 9 Stages) and programmes that scale (at GBS). For newcomers, I urge you to resist silos: publish research and pitch it to boards; teach courses that align with industry trends.

    As I look toward the next chapter, I’m focused on expanding free education models in Africa and refining my digital toolkits. Will it be easy? No. But then again, neither was convincing a roomful of farmers in Cirencester that gaming startups could revolutionize agriculture.

    Final Thought: Your expertise has value in both ivory towers and boardrooms—use it to build bridges, not barriers.

  • The Igbo Apprenticeship Model (IAS) and its benefits for entrepreneurship and business creation

    The Igbo Apprenticeship Model (IAS) and its benefits for entrepreneurship and business creation

    As we try and secure Skills England to agree that an Entrepreneur is a valid occupation, lets look around the world for use cases.

    This blog uses recent empirical and conceptual literature (2010–2025) on the Igbo Apprenticeship System (IAS, also called Igba-Boyi/Igba-Boi, Imu-Oru, etc.) in southeastern Nigeria, with emphasis on how the model develops entrepreneurship skills and fuels business creation. Sources include peer-reviewed articles, theses, working papers, and reputable journalistic and policy accounts. Key themes extracted: historical structure, mechanisms of learning and finance, skills outcomes, firm-creation impacts, constraints and reforms, and research gaps. Erasmus University Thesis Repository

    1. What the IAS is — structure and origins

    The IAS is a predominantly informal, community-based system in which young people (apprentices, often called boyi or odibo) live with and work for established traders/entrepreneurs (masters, oga/madam) to learn a trade, gain market access, and (crucially) receive start-up capital when they “graduate.” The arrangement is contractual but socially enforced: families mediate placements; mentors provide training, credit and networks; apprentices provide labour, loyalty and skill acquisition over a fixed period. Several contemporary studies stress that IAS is both vocational training and an indigenous small-business incubation model embedded in kin and ethnic networks. Wikipedia

    2. Core mechanisms that generate entrepreneurial capacity

    Through our literature review we have identified three mutually reinforcing mechanisms through which IAS builds entrepreneurship capacity:

    1. Practice-based skill transfer. Apprentices learn technical trade skills on-the-job (from tailoring, carpentry to more complex commerce practices), acquiring tacit knowledge rarely conveyed in formal classrooms. This learning takes place via long-term observation, imitation, and scaffolded responsibility. Irene B
    2. Embedded finance and graduated capital transfer. Many masters accumulate savings and then supply a pool of working capital — in cash, goods or credit facilities — to apprentices when they “cycle out.” This capital infusion is often the decisive enabler that converts acquired skills into an independent business. Several empirical studies highlight that this guaranteed capital distinguishes IAS from many other apprenticeship traditions. Ernest Jebolise Chukwuka
    3. Networks and market access. Apprentices inherit supplier links, customer lists, and social reputation from their masters and from ethnic trading networks. These relational assets substantially lower market entry barriers and reduce transaction costs for new enterprises. African Business

    3. Skills and capacities developed

    Researchers group the IAS outcomes into skill clusters:

    • Technical and operational skills: sector-specific craft and trade abilities (e.g., accounting for small traders, inventory handling, pricing). Chukwuma-Nwuba
    • Business and managerial skills: informal training in bookkeeping basics, stock rotation, supplier negotiation, customer relations, and simple business planning learned through practice. ResearchGate
    • Entrepreneurial mindsets and soft skills: risk tolerance, resourcefulness, independence, time discipline, and opportunistic problem solving are repeatedly documented as cultural products of the IAS. Several qualitative studies argue that the IAS socialises entrepreneurial identity. Chukwuma-Nwuba
    • Social capital and reputation management: apprentices learn how to mobilise family and ethnic networks, important for scaling beyond micro-ventures. African Business

    These capabilities together create readiness to found and run micro and small enterprises — often with higher survival probabilities because of the mentoring and capital aspects of the model. Chukwuma-Nwuba

    4. Evidence on business creation, livelihoods and economic effects

    A growing body of quantitative and qualitative work links the IAS to concrete entrepreneurial outcomes:

    • Start-up incidence: Studies and field reports show high rates of business formation among IAS alumni — many graduates immediately open shops, workshops or trading stalls using the capital/support from mentors. Kenneth Nduka Omede
    • SME growth and resilience: IAS-founded firms often evolve into stable micro and small enterprises; some scale to larger trading firms through network reinvestment and apprenticeship cycles (masters who were once apprentices themselves). Chukwuma-Nwuba
    • Poverty alleviation and employment: Research in southeastern Nigeria attributes significant livelihood creation and poverty reduction to the IAS by creating self-employment pathways where formal wage jobs are scarce. Kenneth Nduka Omede

    While many studies are context-specific and observational, convergence across sources supports the claim that IAS is an effective grassroots engine for entrepreneurship and local economic development. African Business

    5. Strengths — why IAS works where formal systems struggle

    Literature highlights several comparative strengths:

    • Cost-effective human capital formation: IAS requires little public expenditure and is demand-driven (market signals determine what is learned). IIARD Journals
    • Integrated finance and training: The built-in post-training capital transfer solves a common gap—trained youth lacking start-up funds. Chukwuma-Nwuba
    • Cultural fit and trust: Embeddedness in family/ethnic networks provides enforcement and reduces moral hazard, a major advantage where formal contract enforcement is weak. African Business

    6. Limitations, challenges and critiques

    Scholars and policy commentators also document important limitations:

    • Informality and regulatory gaps: Lack of formal recognition can limit access to broader finance, formal certification, and scalable support from government or donors. epubs.ac.za
    • Variable quality and exploitation risk: Apprenticeship quality depends on the master; some apprentices face long hours, low pay, or exploitative conditions, and not all receive adequate business mentoring. Chukwu Udoka Helen
    • Gender and inclusion issues: Historically male-dominated in many trades; women and marginalized groups may have less access to the most profitable networks and capital transfers. Research calls for more gender-sensitive analyses. Nigerian Journals Online
    • Scaling and modernisation pressures: Integrating IAS with contemporary financial services, digital markets and formal vocational qualifications remains a policy and practical challenge. Vanguard News

    7. Conclusion — synthesis

    The Igbo Apprenticeship System (IAS) offers valuable lessons for strengthening the UK apprenticeship system, particularly in promoting entrepreneurship, business creation, and social mobility. At its core, the IAS combines practical, immersive learning with structured mentorship and a guaranteed transition into self-employment through start-up capital and access to markets. Integrating these principles into the UK context could address long-standing gaps in enterprise education and the progression of apprentices beyond employment into business ownership.

    First, UK apprenticeship pathways could embed entrepreneurial apprenticeships that mirror the IAS model—pairing young people with experienced small business owners who provide hands-on coaching while developing commercial, financial, and customer-facing competencies. This would extend apprenticeships beyond technical skill acquisition to include core business capabilities such as sales, budgeting, supplier relations, and opportunity recognition.

    Second, adopting the IAS principle of graduation support—through micro-grants, matched savings, or guaranteed access to start-up advice—would help apprentices transition into independent trading or micro-enterprise. Partnerships with local authorities, community lenders, and chambers of commerce could replicate the IAS’s capital and network transfer.

    Finally, IAS-inspired models would strengthen place-based regeneration. By empowering apprentices to start local businesses, the UK could stimulate high-street renewal, build community wealth, and create a pipeline of resilient, locally rooted entrepreneurs.

  • The evolution of entrepreneurship education in universities across the world

    Entrepreneurship education has evolved significantly within universities over the past 100 years. From the early days of offering business courses to developing dedicated programs and centers, universities have come a long way in their efforts to promote entrepreneurship education. In this blog, we will explore the evolution of entrepreneurship education, highlighting research, pedagogy, and trends.

    Early Days of Entrepreneurship Education

    Entrepreneurship education can be traced back to the early 1900s, when business schools started offering courses on small business management. However, the focus was on traditional business management, and entrepreneurship was not a separate subject. It was only in the 1960s that entrepreneurship was recognized as a separate field of study, and universities began offering courses dedicated to entrepreneurship.

    Research in Entrepreneurship Education

    The research in entrepreneurship education started in the 1980s when David Birch published a book called “The Job Generation Process.” In this book, he argued that small businesses were responsible for creating most of the new jobs in the United States. This idea was further supported by other researchers, such as David Storey and Paul Reynolds, who showed that small businesses were an important source of innovation and job creation.

    In the 1990s, researchers started focusing on the pedagogy of entrepreneurship education. William Gartner and Scott Shane published a paper in 1995 that argued that entrepreneurship education should be taught experientially. They proposed that students should be given opportunities to start and run their own businesses, and that this would be the best way to learn about entrepreneurship.

    Pedagogy of Entrepreneurship Education

    The pedagogy of entrepreneurship education has evolved significantly over the years. In the early days, entrepreneurship was taught using traditional business management methods, such as lectures and case studies. However, as research showed that entrepreneurship was best learned through experiential methods, universities started offering more hands-on courses.

    Today, entrepreneurship education is typically taught using a combination of traditional methods and experiential learning. For example, students may attend lectures and read case studies, but they will also have the opportunity to start and run their own businesses, work on consulting projects for real clients, or participate in entrepreneurship competitions.

    Trends in Entrepreneurship Education

    There are several trends in entrepreneurship education that have emerged in recent years. One trend is the development of interdisciplinary entrepreneurship programs. These programs bring together students and faculty from different disciplines, such as engineering, science, and design, to work on entrepreneurial projects.

    Another trend is the development of social entrepreneurship programs. These programs focus on teaching students how to start businesses that have a social or environmental impact. Social entrepreneurship has become increasingly popular in recent years, as students are increasingly interested in starting businesses that can make a positive impact on society.

    In addition, there has been a trend towards global entrepreneurship education. Many universities now offer study abroad programs or international entrepreneurship competitions, which give students the opportunity to learn about entrepreneurship in different cultural contexts.

    Conclusion

    Entrepreneurship education has come a long way over the past 100 years. From offering business courses to developing dedicated programs and centers, universities have recognized the importance of entrepreneurship education in preparing students for the workforce. The research has shown that experiential learning is the best way to teach entrepreneurship, and universities have responded by offering more hands-on courses. The trends in entrepreneurship education reflect the changing needs of students and society, with a focus on interdisciplinary, social, and global entrepreneurship. As the world of work continues to change, entrepreneurship education will continue to evolve to meet the needs of students and society.

  • 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation

    9 Stages of Enterprise Creation

    The way we start businesses is changing and through academic research, additional knowledge, skills and tools, the process and issues around growing businesses have profoundly changed Entrepreneurship in the last twenty years.  This article develops a new 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation model which is based on today entrepreneurial mindset and the business community ecosystem which molds entrepreneurs and allows their ventures grow.

    The first three stages of the Enterprise Creation stages which emerged are: Discovery, Modeling, and Startup which form the new venture formation stages. The next three Existence , Survival and Success develop the business into a sustainable business entity. The last three stages: Adaption, Independence and Exit provide the entrepreneurship pathways for the entrepreneur.  These final elements complete the entrepreneurship model by focusing on the success of the business, how the entrepreneur progresses beyond the business, their separation into different entities and the entrepreneurs eventual exit. The 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation are set out below:

    Stage 1 – Discovery

    This first stage of the 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation  is centred around the focal competency of Opportunity recognition, creation and evaluation. These are the processes by which entrepreneurs identify and evaluate potential new business opportunities. An opportunity by definition is a favorable set of circumstances which creates a need for a new product, business, or service. Opportunity recognition is the process by which the entrepreneur comes up with a prospective idea for a new venture. Evaluating the opportunity takes research, exploration, and understanding of current needs, demands, and trends from consumers and others. The process of researching and surveying allows the product or service idea to develop, so that it can be modelled.

    Stage 2 – Modeling

    The second stage is about developing the business logic to create a business model. This is split into three parts and starts by setting out a Strategy, formulating a business model and setting the business processes to achieve the strategy . These form the key elements for the plan to start the business and, are an integral piece of submitting any proposal for an entrepreneurial or intrapreneurial business. The model should be underpinned by the resources available and those which may still need to be secured. Resource allocation and availability are extremely important to startups because sustainability and profit (not loss) depend on proper planning and understanding of the internal and external environments.

    Stage 3 – Startup

    The fourth stage is starting the enterprise. Once the resources detailed in the business plan are mobilised the entrepreneurial process can be effected and implementation can take place. In this stage the business may be trading or begin to research or develop a product. The aim of this stage is to have the processes in place so that the business can have a scalable, repeatable and profitable business focused on distinct customers within an identified market.

    Stage 4 – Existence

    At this stage the business has two core focuses; to gain enough customers to create a profitable business and, at the same time establishing production or product quality. The majority of businesses fail at this stage due, in part, to either one or both of these factors. At this stage the organisation is a simple one, the entrepreneur does everything and directly supervises subordinates, who should be of at least average competence. Systems and formal planning are minimal to nonexistent. The company’s strategy is simply to remain alive  which requires the focal competency of tolerance of uncertainty, risk and failure

    Stage 5 – Survival

    At this stage the business should be a viable entity in terms of cash flow and resources, it has enough customers and satisfies them sufficiently with its products or services to gain repeat sales. The organisation is still simple. The company may have a limited number of employees supervised by a junior manager or supervisor. Neither of them makes major decisions independently, but instead carries out the rather well-defined orders of the entrepreneur. Formal planning is, at best, cash forecasting. The major goal is still survival, and the entrepreneur is still synonymous with the business. The entrepreneur starts to implement ideas through leadership and management which provides opportunities to scale.

    Stage 6 – Success

    Entrepreneurs at this point of the 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation have a number of options: capitalise on the company’s accomplishments, expand or, keep the company stable and profitable. The entrepreneur has a number of ways to capitalise, from exit to taking a ‘founders dividend’ from the business. If the entrepreneur want to expand  then the core tasks are to make sure the basic organisation stays profitable so that it will not outrun its source of cash and, to develop managers to meet the needs of the growing organisation. Through the entrepreneurs leadership all managers within the business should now identify with the company’s future opportunities rather than its current condition demonstrating a success to its stakeholders.

    Stage 7 – Adaptation

    Businesses which reach this stage normally have a number of factors pushing them to adapt, these are normally grounded in changes either to the micro or macro environments. Businesses at this stage will normally be entering a phase of rapid change and will have to have secured the required finances to develop. At this point key management is in place with a set of operational systems. Operational and strategic planning are now a key focus. The organisation is decentralised and, at least in part, divisionalised. The key managers must be very competent to handle a growing and complex business environment. The systems, strained by growth, are becoming more refined and extensive. Both operational and strategic planning are being done and involve specific managers. The entrepreneur and the business have become reasonably separate, yet the company is still dominated by both the entrepreneur’s presence and stock control.

    Stage 8 – Independence

    A business at this stage should now has the advantages of size, financial resources, market share and managerial talent. Innovation and Intrapreneurship  are now key factors in keeping the business in market position. The organisation has the staff and financial resources to engage in detailed operational and strategic planning. The management is decentralised, adequately staffed, and experienced. Business systems are extensive and well developed. The entrepreneur and the business are quite separate, both financially and operationally.

    Stage 9 – Exit

    The last of the Enterprise Creation stages is focused on exiting the business and making their separation permanent. An exit strategy will give the entrepreneur a way to reduce or eliminate their stake in the business and, if the business is successful, make a substantial profit. This stage removes the entrepreneur from primary ownership and decision-making structure of the business. Common types of exit strategies include Initial Public Offerings (IPO), strategic acquisitions and management buyouts. The organisation at this stage is generally profitable, has a definable set of resources with a clear and realistic strategy to continue. The CEO and founder(s) are separate.

     

    9 stages of Enterprise Creation
    9 stages of Enterprise Creation

    The full paper which develops the 9 Stages of Enterprise Creation:  Bozward, David and Rogers-Draycott, Matthew Charles (2017) Developing a Staged Competency Based Approach to Enterprise Creation. Proceedings of the International Conference for Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development. ISSN 2411-5320, can be found at http://eprints.worc.ac.uk/5377/

    A textbook that supports learning with multiple case studies is available on Amazon.

  • A true Entrepreneur never fails, just learns

    A true Entrepreneur never fails, just learns

    In the recent months, I have been thinking about the journey we take as entrepreneurs. This is not always a logical one and it has many twists and turns but as a lecturer I know it’s important to present a structured approach with a limited set of options. But as a realist, I also know the path to true enlightenment may be through the pit of delusion.

    The message that failure is a good thing is one which many people are now talking about, yet I find our education system still thinks in a binary way, you either pass or fail and this can only be done at defined points, normally set by your age.

    Our Examination system teaches us from a young age that there is only one right answer and many wrong ones. This then provides society with a view of you, typically a grade from A* to U. We sit and judge you from afar, if too many get high marks then the exams were easy, if too little get high mark then the youth of today are spending too much time on their Xbox. The hard fact for many young people is that the grade is final and they be able to change it, even if they get better at that subject. You never get the opportunity to learn from your mistakes or gain a higher grade.

    Yet Entrepreneurship is about the path your take and the reactions to the decisions and not the decisions themselves.

    Everyone is expected to take the wrong turn at some point and the important thing is how you get back on track. How do you learn from the situation? How do you react to your mistake? How do you reflect on the situation and opportunities surrounding you at this point?

    Let me explain this in terms of driving from London to Paris. If you made one wrong turn at any point, then as long as you recognized this fact and acted on this information to rectify it, you would still arrive in Paris. It may or not take longer or extra time. yet our education system would have failed you and asked you to never drive this route again.

    I always explain starting a successful business as having to make one hundred right decisions. Out of how many I do know know. Over what time I do now t know. I don’t know what feedback loop will be in place. When will I know that I have done it?

    We all agree that these decisions will need to be made and that some of them will be shown to be wrong. (Either the right decision at the wrong moment or the wrong decision at the right moment) This is not a fail, just another opportunity to learn, rethink the plan and evaluate your surroundings.

    Our secondary education system needs to develop an opportunity to reflect on the learning and allow the learner to build this into their learning plan moving forward.

    Your path is your own and only on your reflection can you mark yourself.

  • Enterprise in the Community

    Enterprise in the Community

    Entrepreneurship doesn’t happen in isolation. Think about it, its true. So why do Universities think they can create entrepreneurs without developing a sustainable community around them. So what is best practice from universes in the UK?

    Network of Entrepreneurs – Open the doors and get all who start and own businesses to bring their networks into the university and also get those startups to go out into the network of local entrepreneurs. This open door policy helps reduce costs but also helps foster stronger links between those starting a business and those who have strong businesses.

    Mentors – The vast majority of entrepreneurs will mentor a student or graduate who is looking to start a business. However you should be provide training, support and knowledge enhancement for these mentors. How and what is mentoring, when should I do it and what should a say, how far can I go in forcing them to do something? Once you set the ground rules and provide clear guidance they are a great resource. Its about giving before taking.

    Local Customer – A lot of startups think global sales without seeing that just outside the university there are thousand of customers. The fact is the global and local customer are the same distance from them, about a million miles. By bringing local customers to the university and the startups you build a customer base who will provide feedback, cash and support to these startup business.

    Fail Safe – The majority of startups will fail within the first 2 years and the landing pad for this ride should be prepared. Allowing them to understanding the learnings from the business and develop a real knowledge base which can be applied to the next star up will help create better businesses in the future.

    Connected Events – Co-sponsored events which student, entrepreneurs and business professional attend from around the city ensure that students get to understand the wider context of entrepreneurship and able to pitch and network with potential investors.

  • The trinty structure for an entrepreneurship centre

    The trinty structure for an entrepreneurship centre

    Last week I attended GCEC 2014 and was able to spend time with practitioners of Enterprise and Entrepreneurship. It was a very worthwhile experience, especially when so many of them were from the USA which have a much more advanced culture of enterprise.

    It became clear to me that there are three elements for a successful entrepreneurship centre within a University:

    Entrepreneurship Research

    Everyone knows if you start a business in Silicon Valley its great for technology businesses and the eco-system, network and financial institutions are set up to start, grow and IPO these businesses. This is a one place and the rest us don’t live there or want to start a high tech high growth business. This eco-system DOES NOT exist in any other part of the world. Cambridge also has its own eco-system. So we would expect each location, cluster and university to have a set of features that facilitate the growth of certain businesses? We would expect the university to have researched these and further more be able to articulate this through its research papers, education programmes and practical support for startups and growth businesses.

    Enterprise & Entrepreneur Education

    The core business of a university is education. We are experiencing great changes in the higher education environment and universities need to react in real time to the needs of their students and business community. The majority of universities in the UK get more revenue from CPD training than research grants. This is why local business is so important to them, as it provides a great sustainable revenue stream and also the opportunity to understand their local business needs, which helps feed the research. It also brings educators from cross disciplines together which is needed to build robust community focused institutions.

    Enterprise Practice

    The development of students into entrepreneurs and the development of entrepreneurs to leaders of high growth businesses is the most important part of the trinity. It enables the university to substantiate its research in the ‘real world’ environment and provide a practical outlet for the costly education resources. Moreover, it provides the feedback loop which all research and educators need to contextualize the theory.

    I know some universities in the UK have some of these parts, but there is not one University in the UK, which ensures these three parts work together for the common development of the university and its community.

    Looking forward to hear from those that think they do!!!

  • Leadership of Enterprising Groups

    Leadership of Enterprising Groups

    A large number of the attributes of a Non-Profit Organisation (NPO) can be directly applied and are applicable to the Peer Led Student Enterprise Groups (PLEG). Organizational theory review also shows a higher degree of complexity for non-profit organisations when compared to profit oriented businesses.

    As for Mizell (2005) and Lubar (2005) emphasize the quality of management as key to volunteer retention as well as volunteer support. This is nonetheless emphasizing the fact that one of the key responsibility of the non-profit organisation is to factor in volunteers’ potential constraints and be proactive about them. Through this research they found that most of the volunteers expected the manager to practice participating leadership. It was highlighted that the management team of non-profits organizations should think about their leadership style, in order to have the volunteers feel more productive and that they belong to the organization.

    According to Trachtenberg (2006), the key importance of values and belief for non-profit organisation is attracting quality volunteers is one of the most important objectives of the NPO; however, it is a task that is often overlooked or performed poorly by NPO managers and administrators Farmer & Fedor (1999). Volunteerism cannot be separated from the motives, values, and beliefs of the volunteer (Wilson, 2000). The three most important strategies that can be drawn from the research include (1) recruiting volunteers based on their interests, qualifications, and how well they fit with the organization; (2) offering training to support the learning and skills development of volunteers, and; (3) acknowledging directly to volunteers the vital role they play in the success of the organization as well as the contributions that they make in generating the capital needed to meet its mission and its goals.

    Despite the growing contribution of the nonprofits to global economies, nonprofits operate in an increasingly competitive environment. Along the same line, Jay (2010) highlights non-profit sustainability necessity but throw an interesting light on the changing non-profit environment and the related risk associated. Nonprofit literature over the last few decades reflects attempts to examine the competitive environment in which NPOs operate and impact their functioning. Several researchers have used the Porter’s five forces model to capture the competitive intensity in the immediate environment. Whilst the parallels to Porter are striking, the system of relationships proposed for NPOs has not been subjected to empirical testing.

    They observe that this trend towards marketization may pose risks for civil society because nonprofits may lose sight of their social Mission. Also, governments and entrepreneurial business initiatives nested within the NPO have provided other important sources of finance for NPOs. Substantial volatility across all these diverse revenue streams forces NPOs to become adept at multiple stakeholder management.

    A NPO must ensure a flow of resources in order to sustain itself which is typically through earned income, governmental support and private donations. Researchers contributing to this stream of literature have suggested several strategies that can be adopted by NPOs to gain financial substantiality: commercially generated revenues (Lundström et al 1997); application of business principles to fundraising ; employing relationship marketing ; identity-based donations (focusing on the salience of the donors’ identity within the relationship) ; and within and cross sector strategic alliances . In addition to revenue enhancing strategies, researchers have suggested a number of strategies to reduce costs: increased volunteerism and its productivity and soliciting in-kind donations.