Tag Archives: doctoral journey

Best Practices in PhD Supervision

Many people who have completed a PhD or are currently undertaking one, don’t speak highly of their supervisor. I was recently talking to someone who is examining a PhD and their comments were not very positive about how the supervisor had supported the student to create their Thesis. I have also supported PhD students who have had some really bad experiences and gave up on the research.

There is clearly an issue, as you have to had completed a PhD to supervise, so it seems bad practice is driving further bad practice. So this got me thinking, we need to start talking about what is good practice for PhD supervision?

Good Practice in Supervising a PhD Student

Supervisors play a vital role in mentoring, guiding, and supporting students as they navigate the challenges of research and thesis writing. Below, I explore the principles of good practice in PhD supervision, alongside strategies to foster a productive and enriching supervisory relationship.


Best Practices in PhD Supervision

1. Establish a Strong Foundation

Begin the supervision relationship with clear discussions about expectations, roles, and responsibilities. Formalize these agreements in a supervision plan to ensure mutual understanding. Ensure monthly minuted meetings, discuss issues which lock progress, and set actions for the next month so progress can be mapped out over the longer period.

At first PhD supervision meeting, I get out a piece of paper, divide the page into three, one for each of the years, add start and finish points and say, this is what we need to do. Then I draw a line which starts very wildly and eventually settles down to get to the end. (See the image on this article.) Then I say, this is the project plan, we are going to make mistakes, we will find blind alleyways, and some things will take a lot longer than we want, but with this project plan, we now know how to get there and what to expect. They then know, firstly you know how this is going to go and will support them to the end, Secondly, you are happy for them to make mistakes as its in the project plan.

2. Set Clear Milestones

Work with your student to create a roadmap of key milestones and deliverables, over typically a 3 year period. So broadly, literature review, investigation, writing up. Then breaking these into smaller, manageable goals helps maintain momentum and reduces the risk of overwhelm.

3. Encourage Independence

A primary aim of PhD supervision is to foster independent researchers. While guidance is essential, allow students the freedom to make decisions, take risks, and learn from their experiences. This takes different forms, so for example, the literature review may involve looking into parallel fields or new, unproven ideas.

4. Provide Constructive Feedback

Offer feedback that is timely, specific, and actionable. Balance critique with encouragement to ensure students remain motivated while improving their work.

5. Be Accessible and Approachable

Maintain regular communication (so if they email you, reply within 24/48 hours depending on your SLA) and be available for ad hoc meetings when needed. A supervisor’s approachability can significantly impact a student’s confidence and progress.

6. Support Professional Development

Encourage students to engage in activities beyond their thesis, such as presenting at conferences, guest lectures and workshops, publishing research papers, or attending workshops. These opportunities build essential skills and enhance employability whilse build a network of researchers.

7. Monitor Well-being

Stay tuned to the emotional and mental well-being of your students. Pursuing a PhD can be stressful, and your support can make a substantial difference during challenging periods.


Common Mistakes in PhD Supervision

1. Micromanagement

Over-involvement in a student’s work can stifle creativity and hinder the development of independent research skills. Balance supporting the pace of the PhD and getting involved in the work.

2. Lack of Communication

Irregular or insufficient communication can leave students feeling unsupported and directionless. Regular monthly meetings and updates are crucial.

3. Overloading Students

Avoid assigning excessive tasks or responsibilities that detract from the primary focus of their research. Learn to understand the critical path to completing and what activities are not on that path.

4. Ignoring Administrative Responsibilities

Familiarize yourself with institutional requirements for progression, ethics, visa regulations and examination to avoid unnecessary delays in the student’s journey.

5. Failing to Address Conflict

Address conflicts or misunderstandings promptly. Ignoring issues can lead to long-term strain in the supervisor-student relationship. ‘Eat the Frog’ everyday.


Tips for Supervisors

  1. Celebrate Milestones Recognize and celebrate achievements, such as completing a chapter, publishing a paper, or presenting at a conference. Positive reinforcement boosts morale.
  2. Encourage Peer Support Promote peer interaction and collaboration. This helps students gain new perspectives and feel part of a research community.
  3. Leverage Technology Use tools like project management software, virtual meeting platforms, and shared document repositories to streamline supervision.
  4. Stay Current Continuously update your knowledge of your field and supervision practices by attending workshops and networking with other supervisors.
  5. Lead by Example Demonstrate professionalism, curiosity, and commitment in your academic endeavors. Your behavior sets a standard for your students.

Conclusion

Good PhD supervision is a blend of mentorship, academic guidance, and emotional support. By adopting best practices, avoiding common pitfalls, and tailoring your approach to each student’s needs, you can help them succeed not only in completing their thesis but also in developing as confident and capable researchers. The supervisor-student relationship is a rewarding partnership that, when nurtured effectively, benefits both parties and contributes to the broader academic community.

Selecting a good PhD supervisor

Introduction

Choosing the right PhD supervisor is one of the most critical decisions you will make in your academic career. The supervisor you select will significantly influence your research journey, academic growth, and future career prospects. A good supervisor can provide invaluable guidance, support, and resources, whereas a poor match can lead to a challenging and unproductive experience. This guide outlines essential factors to consider and steps to take to ensure you choose a PhD supervisor who aligns with your research interests, working style, and career goals. By following these recommendations, you can enhance your chances of a successful and fulfilling PhD experience.

Steps to take

Selecting a good PhD supervisor is crucial for your academic and professional development. Here are some key steps to help you make a well-informed decision:

  1. Research Interests and Expertise:
    • Ensure that the potential supervisor’s research interests align with your own. Look at their recent publications, projects, and areas of expertise.
    • Consider their reputation in the field. Are they well-regarded and published in reputable journals?
  2. Availability and Accessibility:
    • Assess how available and accessible the supervisor is. Are they actively involved in mentoring their students, or are they often busy and hard to reach?
    • Ask current students about their experiences with the supervisor’s availability.
  3. Supervision Style:
    • Understand their supervision style. Do they prefer regular meetings and close monitoring, or do they give more independence to their students?
    • Determine if their approach matches your working style and needs.
  4. Track Record:
    • Look at the success of their former PhD students. Have these students published papers, attended conferences, and found good positions after graduation?
    • Consider the time it took for their students to complete their PhDs.
  5. Support and Resources:
    • Find out what resources are available through the supervisor, such as funding, lab facilities, and access to networks.
    • Check if they provide support for attending conferences, workshops, and other professional development opportunities.
  6. Personality and Compatibility:
    • It’s important to have a good personal rapport. Consider if you can work well with them on a personal level.
    • Schedule a meeting to discuss your research interests and career goals to gauge compatibility.
  7. Feedback and Communication:
    • Determine how they provide feedback. Is it constructive, timely, and helpful?
    • Evaluate their communication skills and whether they are approachable and open to questions.
  8. Reputation and Connections:
    • A well-connected supervisor can help you build a professional network and open doors for future opportunities.
    • Look for someone who is actively engaged in the academic community and has good industry connections if that’s relevant to your field.
  9. Department and Environment:
    • Consider the department’s culture and environment. Are there other faculty members and students with whom you can collaborate?
    • Assess the overall support system, including administrative staff, peer groups, and professional development resources.
  10. Long-term Vision:
    • Ensure that the supervisor has a clear vision for your research project and can help you develop a viable thesis.
    • Discuss their expectations and your career aspirations to make sure they align.

Steps to Take:

  • Compile a List: Start with a list of potential supervisors based on your research interests.
  • Read Their Work: Review their recent publications and research contributions.
  • Contact Current and Former Students: Get insights into their experiences and the supervisor’s strengths and weaknesses.
  • Schedule Meetings: Have detailed discussions with potential supervisors about your research ideas and their expectations.
  • Visit the Department: If possible, visit the department to get a feel for the environment and resources available.

By thoroughly researching and evaluating these aspects, you can make a more informed decision about selecting a good PhD supervisor who will support and guide you through your doctoral journey.

Further Reading

Times Higher Education: How to Choose a PhD Supervisor

Nature: How to Pick a Graduate Adviser

The Guardian: PhD Study: How to Choose a Good Supervisor

Elsevier: Choosing a PhD Supervisor: 4 Key Considerations

Prospects: How to Choose the Right PhD

Vitae: Choosing a Supervisor

FindAPhD: How to Choose a PhD Supervisor

University of Oxford: Choosing a Research Degree Supervisor