Blog, Enterprise Education

Fostering Entrepreneurial Skills: A Review of David Bozward’s Contributions to Entrepreneurship Education

I am attending IEEC in Belfast and wanted to reflect on the research and publications I have done into Entrepreneurship Education before I attended, so thought I would write this article in the form of a research paper.

Abstract

This article explores the key contributions of David Bozward in the field of entrepreneurship education. It synthesises findings from several studies to examine the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education programmes, the outcomes for students, and the impact on regional development. Bozward’s work, which often focuses on experiential learning and competency-based approaches, provides a significant foundation for understanding the role of education in fostering entrepreneurial skills and mindsets.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Education, David Bozward, Experiential Learning, Competency-Based Learning, Higher Education, Regional Development

1. Introduction

Entrepreneurship education has become a crucial component of higher education curricula worldwide. As economies evolve and the need for innovation intensifies, equipping students with entrepreneurial skills is more critical than ever. This article examines the contributions of David Bozward, a prominent scholar in the field, whose research has significantly influenced how entrepreneurship education is designed and delivered. The objective of this article is to provide a analysis of Bozward’s work, focusing on the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education programmes, the pedagogical approaches he advocates, and the broader socio-economic impacts of these educational initiatives.

2. Entrepreneurship Education Programmes

David Bozward’s research on entrepreneurship education programs, particularly in the UK, provides valuable insights into their effectiveness and structure. His paper “Does Entrepreneurship Education Deliver?” critically examines the Entrepreneurship Education Programmes (EEPs) offered by universities. The study explores active and engaged learning approaches and their impact on student outcomes.

2.1 Programme Structure and Engagement

Bozward argues that traditional lecture-based methods are insufficient in fostering entrepreneurial skills. Instead, he advocates for active learning techniques, such as experiential learning, which involve students in real-world entrepreneurial activities. This approach not only enhances engagement but also ensures that students develop practical skills that are essential for entrepreneurial success.

2.2 Effectiveness of EEPs

The effectiveness of EEPs is a central theme in Bozward’s work. His research indicates that programs incorporating experiential learning and competency-based education are more successful in preparing students for entrepreneurial careers. The study shows that students who participate in such programs are more likely to start their own businesses and are better equipped to deal with the challenges of entrepreneurship.

3. Outcomes of Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education

Bozward’s research, particularly in “Exploring the outcomes of enterprise and entrepreneurship education in UK HEIs”, provides an in-depth analysis of the outcomes of entrepreneurship education. This study focuses on the UK’s higher education institutions (HEIs) and evaluates the impact of entrepreneurship education on students’ entrepreneurial intentions and activities.

3.1 Impact on Entrepreneurial Intentions

Bozward’s findings suggest that entrepreneurship education significantly boosts students’ entrepreneurial intentions. The data show that students who have undergone entrepreneurship education are more likely to consider starting their own businesses. This effect is particularly pronounced in programs that emphasize experiential learning, where students can apply theoretical knowledge to real-life situations.

3.2 Long-term Impact on Business Start-ups

In addition to short-term intentions, Bozward’s research also examines the long-term impact of entrepreneurship education on business start-ups. His studies reveal that students who have been exposed to entrepreneurship education are more likely to start businesses within five years of graduation. This finding underscores the importance of well-designed EEPs in fostering sustainable entrepreneurial activity.

4. Pedagogical Approaches in Entrepreneurship Education

David Bozward is a strong proponent of innovative pedagogical approaches in entrepreneurship education. His work emphasizes the need for education systems to move beyond traditional teaching methods and adopt more dynamic and interactive strategies.

4.1 Experiential Learning

Experiential learning is a cornerstone of Bozward’s pedagogical philosophy. In “Category Archives: Experiential Learning”, he discusses how hands-on experience in entrepreneurship can significantly enhance learning outcomes. This approach involves students in activities such as business simulations, internships, and real-world projects, which provide practical insights and help students develop crucial entrepreneurial skills.

4.2 Competency-Based Learning

Another key aspect of Bozward’s pedagogical approach is competency-based learning, as discussed in his paper “Developing a staged competency based approach to enterprise creation”. This method focuses on equipping students with specific competencies required for entrepreneurial success. Bozward advocates for a staged approach, where students progressively acquire and demonstrate competencies in a structured manner. This approach ensures that students not only gain theoretical knowledge but also develop the practical skills needed to succeed in the entrepreneurial world.

5. Impact on Regional Development

Bozward’s research also extends to the broader socio-economic impacts of entrepreneurship education, particularly its role in regional development. In his paper “The impact of enterprise and entrepreneurship education on regional development”, Bozward explores how entrepreneurship education can drive economic growth and innovation at the regional level.

5.1 Regional Economic Growth

Bozward’s findings indicate that entrepreneurship education can be a powerful tool for regional economic development. By fostering entrepreneurial skills and mindsets, educational institutions can contribute to the creation of new businesses and the revitalization of local economies. Bozward argues that regions with strong entrepreneurship education programs tend to have higher rates of business start-ups and economic resilience.

5.2 Policy Implications

The research also has significant implications for policymakers. Bozward suggests that governments should support and invest in entrepreneurship education as a means of promoting economic growth and development. He recommends policies that encourage the integration of entrepreneurship education into the broader educational system and that support collaboration between educational institutions and the business community.

6. Conclusion

David Bozward’s contributions to entrepreneurship education have had a profound impact on how these programs are designed and delivered. His research highlights the importance of experiential and competency-based learning approaches, which are more effective in preparing students for entrepreneurial careers. Furthermore, his work underscores the broader socio-economic benefits of entrepreneurship education, particularly its role in fostering regional development.

7. References

  • Bozward, D., Rogers-Draycott, M., & Smith, K. (2024). Does Entrepreneurship Education Deliver? A Review of Entrepreneurship Education University Programmes in the UK. Education, MDPI.
  • Bozward, D., Rogers-Draycott, M., & Smith, K. (2022). Exploring the outcomes of enterprise and entrepreneurship education in UK HEIs. Higher Education, Birmingham University.
  • Bozward, D. (2024). The Power of Entrepreneurship Education in Developing Businesses and Resilient Citizens. Bozward.com, Link.
  • Bozward, D., & Rogers-Draycott, M. (2017). Developing a staged competency based approach to enterprise creation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Regional Development, Worcester University.
  • Bozward, D., & Rogers-Draycott, M. (2021). The impact of enterprise and entrepreneurship education on regional development. ISBE Conference, RAU Repository.
Blog

Skills and Competencies Developed Throughout a PhD

Embarking on a PhD journey is not merely about diving deep into a specific area of study; it’s a transformative process that hones a wide array of skills and competencies. These skills transcend academic boundaries and are highly valued across various industries. Here are some key skills and competencies developed during a PhD:

1. Research and Analytical Skills

At the heart of a PhD lies the ability to conduct in-depth research. This involves:

  • Literature Review: Identifying, analyzing, and synthesizing existing research to find gaps and develop new hypotheses.
  • Methodological Rigor: Designing experiments or studies, selecting appropriate methodologies, and ensuring the validity and reliability of results.
  • Data Analysis: Using statistical tools and software to interpret data, draw conclusions, and make informed decisions.
  • Industry Application:
    • Market Research Analyst: Utilize skills in data collection and analysis to study market conditions and identify business opportunities.
    • Policy Analyst: Apply research techniques to assess policies, conduct impact studies, and provide evidence-based recommendations.
    • R&D Specialist: Drive innovation by designing and conducting experiments, and developing new products or processes.

2. Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving

PhD candidates regularly face complex problems that require innovative solutions. This develops:

  • Analytical Thinking: Breaking down complex problems into manageable parts and systematically addressing each component.
  • Creative Problem-Solving: Thinking outside the box to develop novel solutions and approaches to research questions.
  • Industry Application:
  • Consulting: Offer strategic advice to businesses by analyzing complex problems and proposing innovative solutions.
  • Business Development: Identify growth opportunities and devise strategies to overcome market challenges.
  • Technology Development: Solve technical problems and develop new technologies or improve existing ones.

3. Project Management

Completing a PhD is akin to managing a long-term project, which builds skills such as:

  • Time Management: Balancing multiple tasks and deadlines, often with limited resources.
  • Resource Management: Efficiently utilizing available resources, whether it’s funding, equipment, or data.
  • Goal Setting and Milestones: Establishing clear objectives and milestones to track progress and stay on course.
  • Industry Application:
  • Project Manager: Oversee projects from conception to completion, ensuring they are delivered on time, within scope, and budget.
  • Operations Manager: Streamline operations and manage resources efficiently to meet organizational goals.
  • Program Coordinator: Organize and coordinate programs, managing timelines, resources, and stakeholder communications.

4. Communication Skills

Effective communication is crucial for a successful PhD journey, encompassing:

  • Writing Skills: Crafting clear and concise research papers, theses, and grant proposals.
  • Presentation Skills: Delivering compelling presentations at conferences and seminars, and defending the dissertation.
  • Interpersonal Skills: Collaborating with supervisors, peers, and industry professionals, and networking within the academic community.
  • Industry Application:
  • Technical Writer: Create user manuals, product guides, and documentation that convey complex information clearly.
  • Public Relations Specialist: Craft compelling narratives and manage communication strategies for organizations.
  • Training and Development: Design and deliver training programs to enhance employee skills and knowledge.

5. Technical Proficiency

Depending on the field of study, a PhD can significantly enhance technical skills, including:

  • Advanced Software and Tools: Mastery of specialized software for data analysis, modeling, or simulation.
  • Laboratory Techniques: Proficiency in using advanced laboratory equipment and techniques for scientific research.
  • Programming and Coding: Developing and using algorithms, scripts, and coding languages relevant to the research field.
  • Industry Application:
  • Data Scientist: Use statistical tools and programming skills to analyze large datasets and derive actionable insights.
  • Software Developer: Apply coding skills to develop software applications, algorithms, and systems.
  • Engineer: Utilize technical expertise to design, develop, and test engineering solutions.

6. Teaching and Mentoring

Many PhD candidates engage in teaching or mentoring roles, which fosters:

  • Educational Skills: Designing and delivering lectures, tutorials, and workshops.
  • Mentorship: Guiding and supporting undergraduate or junior researchers in their academic and research endeavors.
  • Industry Application:
  • Corporate Trainer: Develop and deliver training programs to improve employee performance and organizational effectiveness.
  • Academic Roles: Continue teaching at universities or educational institutions, sharing expertise with students.
  • Mentorship Programs: Lead and participate in mentorship initiatives within organizations to guide and develop junior staff.

7. Resilience and Adaptability

The PhD journey is often fraught with setbacks and challenges, which builds:

  • Perseverance: The ability to persist in the face of obstacles and setbacks.
  • Adaptability: Being flexible and open to changing approaches based on new findings or feedback.
  • Industry Application:
  • Entrepreneurship: Navigate the uncertainties and challenges of starting and running a business.
  • Change Management: Help organizations adapt to changes in technology, market conditions, or internal processes.
  • Crisis Management: Manage and mitigate risks during times of crisis, maintaining business continuity.

8. Ethical and Professional Conduct

PhD candidates are held to high ethical standards, which instills:

  • Integrity: Adhering to ethical guidelines and conducting research with honesty and transparency.
  • Professionalism: Maintaining a professional demeanor in academic and research settings.
  • Industry Application:
  • Compliance Officer: Ensure that organizations adhere to regulatory requirements and ethical standards.
  • Quality Assurance: Uphold high standards in product development, testing, and implementation.
  • Corporate Governance: Promote ethical practices and integrity within corporate structures.

9. Leadership and Independence

A PhD cultivates leadership skills through:

  • Independent Research: Taking ownership of research projects and driving them to completion with minimal supervision.
  • Leadership Roles: Leading research teams, organizing academic events, or participating in academic committees.
  • Industry Application:
  • Executive Roles: Lead organizations, departments, or teams with a vision and strategic direction.
  • Innovation Leadership: Drive innovation initiatives and foster a culture of creativity and continuous improvement.
  • Independent Consulting: Offer expert advice and solutions as an independent consultant in your field of expertise.

Conclusion

A PhD is a journey of intellectual and personal growth, equipping candidates with a diverse skill set that extends far beyond their specific area of study. These competencies are not only essential for a career in academia but are also highly transferable to various professional fields, making PhD graduates valuable assets in any industry.

The comprehensive skill set developed during a PhD program is invaluable in the job market. Employers across various sectors recognize the value of these skills, understanding that PhD graduates bring a unique combination of expertise, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities. Whether it’s in research and development, project management, communication, or leadership, the competencies gained during a PhD can significantly enhance an individual’s career prospects and contribute to their success in diverse professional environments.

Whether it’s through the rigorous process of research, the challenges of problem-solving, or the nuances of effective communication, the skills developed during a PhD are a testament to the transformative power of this advanced level of education.

Blog, Phd

Project Managing Your PhD: A Guide to Success

Embarking on a PhD journey is both an exciting and daunting task. It’s a marathon, not a sprint, requiring meticulous planning, organization, and perseverance. Treating your PhD as a project can be a game-changer, allowing you to manage time effectively, stay organized, and achieve your milestones. Here’s a comprehensive guide to project managing your PhD.

1. Define Clear Objectives

The first step in project management is to define clear, achievable objectives. Your PhD objectives might include:

  • Completing coursework and qualifying exams
  • Conducting literature reviews
  • Designing and conducting experiments or studies
  • Writing and publishing papers
  • Writing your dissertation

Break these down into specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals. This clarity will provide a roadmap for your PhD journey.

2. Create a Detailed Plan

Once your objectives are clear, create a detailed project plan. Use tools like Gantt charts or project management software (e.g., Trello, Asana) to map out tasks and deadlines. Your plan should include:

  • Milestones for each year or semester
  • Detailed timelines for each phase of your research
  • Buffer times for unexpected delays

Regularly update your plan to reflect progress and any changes in your research direction.

3. Time Management

Effective time management is crucial for a successful PhD. Here are some strategies:

  • Pomodoro Technique: Break your work into focused intervals (e.g., 25 minutes), followed by short breaks. This can increase productivity and prevent burnout.
  • Prioritize Tasks: Use the Eisenhower Matrix to prioritize tasks based on urgency and importance. Focus on high-priority tasks that align with your PhD objectives.
  • Set Deadlines: Establish both short-term and long-term deadlines to stay on track. Self-imposed deadlines can be as motivating as external ones.

4. Resource Management

Identify and manage the resources you need for your research:

  • Financial Resources: Budget for research costs, travel, conferences, and publications. Apply for grants and scholarships to secure funding.
  • Human Resources: Collaborate with advisors, mentors, and peers. Build a support network to share knowledge and receive feedback.
  • Technical Resources: Ensure you have access to necessary equipment, software, and databases. Stay updated with the latest tools and technologies in your field.

5. Risk Management

Anticipate potential risks and develop contingency plans:

  • Research Risks: Experiments might fail, or data might be inconclusive. Have backup plans and alternative methods ready.
  • Personal Risks: Health issues or personal emergencies can disrupt your schedule. Maintain a work-life balance and seek support when needed.
  • Academic Risks: Deadlines might be missed, or publications might be rejected. Prepare for setbacks and remain adaptable.

6. Regular Progress Reviews

Regularly reviewing your progress helps you stay aligned with your goals:

  • Weekly Check-Ins: Assess your weekly achievements and set priorities for the coming week.
  • Monthly Reviews: Reflect on the past month’s progress, identify challenges, and adjust your plan accordingly.
  • Annual Reviews: Evaluate your yearly milestones and set objectives for the next year.

7. Effective Communication

Maintain open and effective communication with your advisors, peers, and collaborators:

  • Regular Meetings: Schedule regular meetings with your advisor to discuss progress, challenges, and feedback.
  • Networking: Attend conferences, workshops, and seminars to connect with other researchers and stay updated with industry trends.
  • Documentation: Keep detailed records of your research process, findings, and communications. Good documentation ensures clarity and can be invaluable when writing your dissertation.

8. Self-Care and Motivation

A PhD can be mentally and physically demanding. Prioritize self-care to sustain your motivation and well-being:

  • Healthy Lifestyle: Maintain a balanced diet, exercise regularly, and get sufficient sleep.
  • Mental Health: Practice mindfulness, meditation, or other stress-relief techniques. Seek professional help if needed.
  • Rewards: Celebrate small victories to keep yourself motivated. Acknowledge and reward your hard work and progress.

Conclusion

Project managing your PhD is about breaking down the massive task into manageable parts, staying organized, and maintaining flexibility. By setting clear goals, managing your time and resources effectively, anticipating risks, and taking care of yourself, you can navigate the challenges of a PhD and achieve success. Remember, your PhD is a journey—plan it well and enjoy the ride.

Blog, Phd

Selecting a good PhD supervisor

Introduction

Choosing the right PhD supervisor is one of the most critical decisions you will make in your academic career. The supervisor you select will significantly influence your research journey, academic growth, and future career prospects. A good supervisor can provide invaluable guidance, support, and resources, whereas a poor match can lead to a challenging and unproductive experience. This guide outlines essential factors to consider and steps to take to ensure you choose a PhD supervisor who aligns with your research interests, working style, and career goals. By following these recommendations, you can enhance your chances of a successful and fulfilling PhD experience.

Steps to take

Selecting a good PhD supervisor is crucial for your academic and professional development. Here are some key steps to help you make a well-informed decision:

  1. Research Interests and Expertise:
    • Ensure that the potential supervisor’s research interests align with your own. Look at their recent publications, projects, and areas of expertise.
    • Consider their reputation in the field. Are they well-regarded and published in reputable journals?
  2. Availability and Accessibility:
    • Assess how available and accessible the supervisor is. Are they actively involved in mentoring their students, or are they often busy and hard to reach?
    • Ask current students about their experiences with the supervisor’s availability.
  3. Supervision Style:
    • Understand their supervision style. Do they prefer regular meetings and close monitoring, or do they give more independence to their students?
    • Determine if their approach matches your working style and needs.
  4. Track Record:
    • Look at the success of their former PhD students. Have these students published papers, attended conferences, and found good positions after graduation?
    • Consider the time it took for their students to complete their PhDs.
  5. Support and Resources:
    • Find out what resources are available through the supervisor, such as funding, lab facilities, and access to networks.
    • Check if they provide support for attending conferences, workshops, and other professional development opportunities.
  6. Personality and Compatibility:
    • It’s important to have a good personal rapport. Consider if you can work well with them on a personal level.
    • Schedule a meeting to discuss your research interests and career goals to gauge compatibility.
  7. Feedback and Communication:
    • Determine how they provide feedback. Is it constructive, timely, and helpful?
    • Evaluate their communication skills and whether they are approachable and open to questions.
  8. Reputation and Connections:
    • A well-connected supervisor can help you build a professional network and open doors for future opportunities.
    • Look for someone who is actively engaged in the academic community and has good industry connections if that’s relevant to your field.
  9. Department and Environment:
    • Consider the department’s culture and environment. Are there other faculty members and students with whom you can collaborate?
    • Assess the overall support system, including administrative staff, peer groups, and professional development resources.
  10. Long-term Vision:
    • Ensure that the supervisor has a clear vision for your research project and can help you develop a viable thesis.
    • Discuss their expectations and your career aspirations to make sure they align.

Steps to Take:

  • Compile a List: Start with a list of potential supervisors based on your research interests.
  • Read Their Work: Review their recent publications and research contributions.
  • Contact Current and Former Students: Get insights into their experiences and the supervisor’s strengths and weaknesses.
  • Schedule Meetings: Have detailed discussions with potential supervisors about your research ideas and their expectations.
  • Visit the Department: If possible, visit the department to get a feel for the environment and resources available.

By thoroughly researching and evaluating these aspects, you can make a more informed decision about selecting a good PhD supervisor who will support and guide you through your doctoral journey.

Further Reading

Times Higher Education: How to Choose a PhD Supervisor

Nature: How to Pick a Graduate Adviser

The Guardian: PhD Study: How to Choose a Good Supervisor

Elsevier: Choosing a PhD Supervisor: 4 Key Considerations

Prospects: How to Choose the Right PhD

Vitae: Choosing a Supervisor

FindAPhD: How to Choose a PhD Supervisor

University of Oxford: Choosing a Research Degree Supervisor

Blog, Phd

The PhD Literature Review

Introduction

The purpose of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research related to [your research topic]. As the foundation of any PhD thesis, the literature review serves to contextualize the current study within the broader academic discourse. It identifies significant trends, debates, and gaps within the field, thereby justifying the necessity and relevance of the proposed research.

The scope of this review encompasses key publications from [specific time frame], focusing on [specific geographical areas, if applicable], and covering major themes such as [list key themes]. This literature review is organized thematically to address the primary areas of interest and methodological approaches relevant to the research question. By critically evaluating and synthesizing the existing literature, this review aims to highlight the contributions and limitations of previous studies, offering a clear framework for situating the current research.

To ensure a thorough and unbiased review, multiple academic databases were consulted, including [name key databases], alongside grey literature such as theses, conference proceedings, and reports. This multi-source approach ensures a comprehensive capture of the relevant academic landscape.

Through this literature review, we aim to elucidate the existing knowledge on [your research topic], identify methodological strengths and weaknesses, and pinpoint areas where further research is imperative. This will not only demonstrate a thorough understanding of the subject matter but also establish a solid foundation for the subsequent chapters of this dissertation.

Parts of a PhD Literature Review

Below is a detailed guide for writing a literature review for a PhD:

Introduction

  1. Purpose and Scope:
    • Define the purpose of your literature review. Explain what you intend to achieve and how it relates to your research question.
    • Outline the scope of your review, including the time frame, geographical limitations, and key themes.
  2. Organization and Structure:
    • Describe how your literature review is organized. Common structures include thematic, chronological, methodological, or a combination of these.

Searching for Literature

  1. Database Selection:
    • Identify and use multiple academic databases relevant to your field (e.g., PubMed for medical research, JSTOR for humanities, IEEE Xplore for engineering).
    • Use library resources and consult with librarians to access comprehensive and obscure databases.
  2. Search Strategies:
    • Develop a list of keywords and phrases related to your topic.
    • Use Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to refine your searches.
    • Apply filters to narrow down results by date, type of publication, and other criteria.

Evaluating and Selecting Sources

  1. Relevance and Quality:
    • Assess the relevance of each source to your research question.
    • Evaluate the quality and credibility of the sources, considering factors like the reputation of the journal, the author’s expertise, and citation counts.
  2. Types of Sources:
    • Include a mix of primary sources (original research, case studies) and secondary sources (reviews, meta-analyses).
    • Consider grey literature (theses, reports, conference papers) for a more comprehensive view.

Analyzing the Literature

  1. Thematic Analysis:
    • Identify and group sources by key themes or topics. This helps to create a coherent narrative.
    • Discuss how each theme contributes to the understanding of your research question.
  2. Methodological Analysis:
    • Compare and contrast the methodologies used in different studies.
    • Highlight strengths and weaknesses, and discuss how methodological choices impact the findings.
  3. Chronological Analysis:
    • Trace the development of ideas over time.
    • Identify how theories, methods, and findings have evolved and influenced current research.

Synthesis and Critical Evaluation

  1. Identify Gaps:
    • Highlight areas where the literature is lacking or where further research is needed.
    • Discuss controversies and unresolved questions in the field.
  2. Develop a Conceptual Framework:
    • Integrate findings from various sources to develop a conceptual framework for your research.
    • Show how your research will address identified gaps and contribute to the field.
  3. Critically Evaluate:
    • Critique the quality of the existing literature, noting any biases, methodological flaws, or limitations.
    • Discuss the implications of these limitations for your research.

Writing the Literature Review

  1. Introduction:
    • Start with a clear statement of the purpose of the review.
    • Provide an overview of the organization of the review.
  2. Body:
    • Organize the body into sections based on themes, methodologies, or chronology.
    • Summarize and synthesize findings from the literature, integrating your critical evaluation.
  3. Conclusion:
    • Summarize the main findings of your literature review.
    • Restate the gaps and explain how your research will address them.
    • Highlight the significance of your research in the broader context of the field.

Final Steps

  1. Editing and Proofreading:
    • Review your literature review for clarity, coherence, and logical flow.
    • Proofread for grammatical and typographical errors.
  2. Feedback:
    • Seek feedback from peers, mentors, or supervisors.
    • Revise your review based on constructive feedback.
  3. Citation Management:
    • Ensure all sources are correctly cited in your preferred citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).
    • Use reference management software (e.g., EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero) to keep track of your citations and generate bibliographies.

By following these steps, you can create a comprehensive and well-structured literature review that sets a solid foundation for your PhD research.

Talking About Entrepreneurship